Make GitHub capability ownership opinionated - #25
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
manageTemplateopt-out and itspreservePathstransition machineryrequirePrexclusively own a stronger canonical.github/pull_request_template.mdWhy
The temporary split-ownership design added configuration and reconciliation paths that worked against Hypervibe's desired-state model. Enabled GitHub capabilities should have one clear owner: Hypervibe. This keeps the surface smaller and makes drift behavior predictable while retaining
externalWorkflowsas the explicit read-only integration boundary.Impact
Repositories that enable
github.collaboration.pullRequests.requirePrreceive the Hypervibe-owned canonical template. On the next infrastructure apply, a previously managed uppercase template is replaced with the lowercase canonical path. When deployment workflow drift occurs in the canonical GitHub environment, all known managed repository files are proposed in the same pending PR; secrets, bindings, settings, and the applied contract marker remain deferred until merge.This removes only behavior introduced in the unreleased follow-up to #24, so no published compatibility period is required.
Verification
npm test -- --configLoader runner— 104 files, 815 tests passednpm run typechecknpm run buildnpm_config_cache=/private/tmp/hypervibe-npm-cache npm run prepublish-checkgit diff --checkRisks and follow-up
After merge, release Hypervibe 0.1.4, rebuild/restart the MCP, then update the HLS desired state (
enforceAdmins: true) and run the staged plan/apply workflow.