Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
|
Nothing in the tests is against you here, Leo, and the proof was already sitting in your own fork. The one thing to do, when you rebuild the branch: give the constant the same name in both files, and judge only the run for a commit where both files carry it. Which name is up to you. With // e107_admin/history.php
'history_table' => array ( 'title' => LAN_HISTORY_TABLE, 'type' => 'text', ...
// e107_languages/English/admin/lan_admin.php
'LAN_HISTORY_TABLE' => "Table",Why it kept failing on that one. I read the eight Unit Tests runs on your fork from 1 September (times UTC). You renamed the Table constant three times, and the web editor commits one file at a time, so every rename produced one run on the half-done state and one on the finished state:
Every red is a commit where the two files disagree. Every green is one where they agree, and those greens ran the whole suite with all eleven constants in place. After Why the first red named only one constant. At Reading it next time. The test is The name in quotes is the one to search for in Two things for the PR:
A red run describes the one commit it ran on, not your install. The check is whether both files carry the same name at that commit. |



Good to hear the retest is on its way, Leo. Three answers, shortest first.
Names for the six help lines: take a word from each line. Six lines are six constants either way; the name only changes what someone reading
history.phpsees. Your text stays as it is, only the names change: