adding declarative to Elm Tags.md (see comment link) #528
Conversation
as mentioned here, functional languages should be tagged declarative too. exercism/haskell#1124 (comment)
|
Hi Andrea, I have no strong opinion about this, but I think that others may do. If nobody replies after a while then I'll approve it. |
|
Hi @ceddlyburge :) tbh, I would not add declarative to any functional language. However, if Haskell has to have it I'd add it here (and more?) for consistency. Not meaning to criticize here, just trying to help with the languages I care the most about. That said, Exercism should have an official policy/rule about this. Perhaps it's my OCD talking, don't mind me :P |
|
Good to know! I don't really mind either way, and it does make sense to be consistent within exercism. I'll give Matthieu and Jeremie a couple of days to wade in with an opinion if they want to, and if they don't I'll merge it. |
|
Funny how emotive these details get sometimes :) |
jiegillet
left a comment
jiegillet
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm good with it, from what I can read about declarative programming languages, Elm is a great fit for it.
|
Yep, good with it too |
based on both haskell tags and javascript tags. didn't add checkmarks where not strictly official. however, commented those with "possible" where a technology can offer that functionality.
|
@ceddlyburge @jiegillet @mpizenberg I've added TAGS.md as well, since it was missing. Please double check that before merging. Sorry, I just noticed. |
Co-authored-by: Cedd Burge <ceddlyburge@users.noreply.github.com>
|
yay! thank you all :) |
4 participants
as mentioned here, functional languages should be tagged declarative too. exercism/haskell#1124 (comment)