binary-search: Add test version string

[CSJedi]

Hi, I checked data in binary_search_test.py with data in canonical-data.json

resolves #989

[N-Parsons]

Looks like the version number is wrong - the canonical data is version 1.0.0.

This like also need to have an extra blank line before it in order to pass the flake8 tests for compliance with PEP8.

[CSJedi]

Hi, so if I change nuber of version , all will pass good?

[N-Parsons]

Hi @CSJedi, could you include resolves #989 in the PR description? Magic words help us to keep track of issues.

It would also be helpful in future PRs to have the exercise name at the start of the PR title - it makes it easier for maintainers to see at a glance.

[CSJedi]

I added resolves #989 to description of this issue. Did I do this right? You mean that on "resolves #989"

[CSJedi]

Do you need help in checking another files?

[CSJedi]

Do I do this check right?

[ilya-khadykin]

@CSJedi what's the deal with all of this renaming stuff?

[cmccandless]

@CSJedi The hacktoberfest label is not required for Hacktoberfest credit.

[N-Parsons]

Hi @CSJedi, thanks for fixing the version number. Looks like everything is good now, so I'll merge it.

I've updated the description and title of your PR for you, to show you what I meant. Using this format for the title helps us to easily see what the PR does, and the magic words in the description (appears as your first comment here) mean that the corresponding issue will automatically be closed when the PR is merged.