-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Moved the exercises to the folder exercises/ #286
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
This is a great practice! Thank you :) I wonder if something changed with how Travis is setting up the environment that this is running on, since all the versions are failing. I'll open an issue and see if any of the python track maintainers can take a look at that before we merge any PRs. |
|
Have you tested that |
|
Actually I did, but it returned I mean, I am assuming it should have failed if it wasn't able to find the exercises paths. |
|
The problem is that the test runner ( |
|
@behrtam I found the problem and fixed it. Now the test are being ran and they all pass. Now I was thinking of implementing the check against the |
6543b79 to
0330a7a
Compare
|
@behrtam I did the rebase and pushed the new changes to my fork (which updates this PR. Yes, I'm writing it so I get it fixed in my head). Could you please check that I didn't make a mess with all the rebase/commit/push -f/etc things? |
|
I think you accidentally included two files ( |
|
Damn. |
0330a7a to
186576b
Compare
|
@behrtam I'm sorry, I tried for the last two hours to find a solution to the mess I made, but there does not seem to be any. At this point, I think that deleting the PR and redoing everything from scratch is the only solution. Unless you know of something else. |
|
If you rename your current branch to something else, e.g. Then cherrypick the commits you want, and then |
|
Starting over from And I never used |
|
No, if you start over from the most recent master on upstream then you don't get any of those pull requests: |
|
You can also |
186576b to
0112dae
Compare
0112dae to
99c29c3
Compare
|
On my fork the things now seem to look sane, but GH does not totally agree, apparently? Edit: Oh, and I made sure that the test passed. Everything seem to work fine. |
|
Sorry that I have to nitpick again, but you missed the single exercise test. |
|
@behrtam Thanks for pointing that out. It works now, here's some output: |
|
There is one last really small (2x ".") change we have to do. If you have a closer look at the travis-ci build, it executes the tests from the root project directory ( Thanks again for your persistence. We will get this PR done soon. |
|
@behrtam I can do the change, problem is that I actually tried the single dot solution first, but I wasn't able to make the tests run. So I don't think I will be able to test it after the change (unless you don't have a suggestion here). Should I do the (relatively) blind change anyway? |
|
Do it anyway. The |
|
Done. Let's see what happens... |
|
travis-ci-job/105144407 All tests running like a charm. Thanks for your work! |
Moved the exercises to the folder exercises
|
Thanks to you and @kytrinyx for the patience. I'm sorry if I messed things up. |
|
One of the wonderful things with git and github is that it's nearly impossible to mess things up. Sure, they'll get confusing, but that's just temporary :) We're all good. I'm always happy to help people figure out how to solve things when they get themselves up git creek. |
|
Thank you :) |
As issue #282 stated, I moved the exercises to an
exercises/folder.I decided to do this in a different branch in order to avoid this pull request being mixed in with the other one I made yesterday about doc files (since they were actually two but GH merged them into a single one).
If this is not a good practice please let me know, I'm not that experienced in contributing to projects.