-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 199
Firedrake meeting 2026 07 14
Date and time 2026-07-14 1600 UTC+1
- Pick Chair and Minuter (IM to pick)
- ALL: (ongoing) triage the open issues and confirm if they are indeed still open (and perhaps provide labels)
- ALL: do things with SV's branches
- DH: Email to Andreas to have 2 (+ others!!!) loopy PRs merged TODO: FIND OUT WHICH PRS THESE ARE
- DH: Talk to GregVernon about PR#2116.
- JHC: New manual release
Present: LC, IM, AC, CW, DH, PB, NW, JHC
Apologies:
https://github.com/firedrakeproject/firedrake/pull/5243
- Leo needs to merge
cached_property_until, then use it in this PR.
https://github.com/firedrakeproject/firedrake/pull/5244
I've been using this to plot particles in ParaView and it seems to work well. What do people think about this?
For reference, another solution would be to write particle data to H5PART files (based on HDF5) which a lot of particle simulation codes seem to be using.
- Would passing a vom to
get_topologywork? May need a small interception somewhere.
https://github.com/firedrakeproject/firedrake/pull/5127
Reviewed last week. Here I trained AI to implement new code and fix bugs in firedrake.adjoint.
- Looks similar to what we do with subfunctions adjoint
- Replace BCs in
forward_nlvsinstead of update them?- The forward nlvs has copies of Coefficients. The same thing needs to apply to the boundary conditions.
- Should this go into release?
- It does fix a bug.
- Merge into release, then release into main, then do the projector stuff into main
This is the design we discussed in the PETSc meeting. The diff is large (adding +500 lines each, ~half being tests), so let's just have a high-level disscusion about API and the new modules (adapt.py, redist.py)
Support DMPlex adaptivity #5215
https://github.com/firedrakeproject/firedrake/pull/5189
- approved
- Docs failed because docker has old petsc version
-approve
1600 UTC+0100 2026-07-21