Restore Pure Hello Echo as Roadmap A - #15
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
@codex please review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
WalkthroughThe documentation restores Pure Hello Echo as Roadmap A, formalizes durable external request and settlement boundaries, updates the phase graph to a typed state-machine model, and moves the self-hosted delivery loop to Roadmap Ω. ChangesRoadmap and protocol reconciliation
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/legacy/delivery-loop-prompt.md`:
- Around line 28-30: Update the introductory ownership note in the baseline
prompt to describe it as a preserved, still-operative human-directed execution
protocol rather than historical execution input. Retain the explicit sunset
condition tied to Roadmap Ω passing its negative envelope tests, and keep the
existing references to docs/roadmap.md and docs/phase-graph.md.
In `@docs/phase-graph.md`:
- Around line 148-156: Align the documentation reconciliation prose with the
declared state effects: have P38_RECONCILE_DOCS only prepare and validate the
deterministic projection, and have P39_COMMIT_DOCS emit/apply the
ApplyValidatedPatch request. Update the affected state table and transition
semantics consistently, preserving separate implementation and documentation
commit staging.
- Around line 91-94: The B06 entry in the phase graph incorrectly describes
publication as an allowed effect. Update the row and related B06 contract
terminology to describe only bootstrap-publication preconditions or observation,
unless the contract is explicitly expanded to permit a non-main publication
operation; keep the catalog consistent with the allowed
ObserveRepositorySnapshot action and direct-main escalation.
In `@docs/roadmap.md`:
- Around line 41-48: Normalize the settlement disposition referenced in the
roadmap flow and surrounding text with the canonical wire-level literal used by
docs/feasibility.md and docs/phase-graph.md, outcome_unknown. If uppercase
remains in the diagram, explicitly label OUTCOME_UNKNOWN as presentation-only
and ensure protocol-facing examples use the lowercase value consistently.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 6ed8edc2-beec-4eda-bbb9-5dbc2cce5e8d
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
CHANGELOG.mdREADME.mddocs/feasibility.mddocs/legacy/delivery-loop-prompt.mddocs/phase-graph.mddocs/roadmap.md
📜 Review details
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/feasibility.md
[grammar] ~107-~107: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...API | No | Genuine gap | Domain operations such as OpenPullRequest and ObservePullRequestChecks, each ...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
docs/phase-graph.md
[style] ~106-~106: The words ‘observation’ and ‘observe’ are quite similar. Consider replacing ‘observe’ with a different word.
Context: ...udgment | SelectTieTask | | Fetch and observe origin/main | External interaction | ...
(VERB_NOUN_SENT_LEVEL_REP)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
docs/legacy/delivery-loop-prompt.md (1)
5-18: LGTM!docs/roadmap.md (1)
1-40: LGTM!Also applies to: 50-167
docs/feasibility.md (1)
21-32: LGTM!Also applies to: 69-69, 102-108, 117-172, 174-199, 200-239, 240-263
README.md (1)
12-16: LGTM!CHANGELOG.md (1)
16-21: LGTM!docs/phase-graph.md (1)
15-23: LGTM!Also applies to: 71-90, 95-145, 301-357, 511-527, 537-549, 673-716, 741-744
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 262a586253
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| These names identify future external-operation request families. They do not | ||
| authorize a current implementation. Edict may construct a declared request; | ||
| Echo records and coordinates it; an operation-specific adapter alone performs | ||
| it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When implementing any transition, this definition also classifies PersistRunState (catalogued at line 339 and implicit on every transition at lines 361-362) as an external request performed by an adapter. Persisting the request or settlement would then itself require another persisted PersistRunState request, creating an infinite regress at the durability boundary. Define state/history persistence as an Echo-internal atomic primitive rather than one of the external-operation request families.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| `P38_RECONCILE_DOCS` validates the proposal and emits an | ||
| `ApplyValidatedPatch` request for an adapter; the model receives no write |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When a fix includes a documentation delta, this prose makes P38_RECONCILE_DOCS emit ApplyValidatedPatch, but the state/effect table explicitly permits P38 only RunRegisteredCheck and ObserveRepositorySnapshot; the patch effect is assigned to P39_COMMIT_DOCS at lines 388-389. An implementation following the prose therefore violates the rule that each state may use only its listed effects, while one following the table cannot perform the transition as described. Move the request to P39 or declare it for P38 consistently.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| Implement `docs/phase-graph.md` only after Roadmaps A, A.1, and C prove their | ||
| boundaries. The preserved natural-language loop remains the operative |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When A, A.1, and C are complete but Graft has not yet been hosted, this prerequisite permits Roadmap Ω to begin even though the newly added README explicitly orders Graft hosting before the Git/GitHub adapters and self-hosted loop (README.md lines 13-15). Since Roadmap Ω is the capstone of the Graft-on-Echo campaign, include Roadmap B in this prerequisite so the active ordering cannot skip the hosted Graft vertical.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| - `OpenPullRequest`; | ||
| - `ObservePullRequestChecks`; | ||
| - `ObserveReviewThreads`; and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When Roadmap C is implemented literally, it produces OpenPullRequest, ObservePullRequestChecks, and ObserveReviewThreads, but the target phase graph declares OpenTaskPullRequest and ObserveGitHubState instead (docs/phase-graph.md lines 319 and 325). Because this design treats operation identity as an exact package-closure value rather than an informal capability name, completing these listed adapters would still leave Roadmap Ω unable to construct its declared requests. Use the same identities in both documents or define an explicit lowering between them.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| E->>E: admit REQUESTED | ||
| E->>A: grant bounded claim | ||
| A->>E: settlement plus evidence | ||
| E->>E: admit SETTLED or OUTCOME_UNKNOWN |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When a non-idempotent adapter's result is ambiguous after lease expiry, this diagram instructs Echo to admit a distinct OUTCOME_UNKNOWN record, while the locked invariant at line 162 and the concrete schema in docs/feasibility.md lines 155-158 and 184-185 define it as EffectSettled(disposition = outcome_unknown). Implementations following opposite representations will disagree on history decoding and whether the waiting program can consume the obstruction during recovery. Use the EffectSettled representation in the diagram or define a separate record consistently throughout.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Restores the compiler-to-runtime Hello Echo proof as the active roadmap. Separates deterministic law, external interaction, and judgment; defines request-before-effect and settlement-before-resumption; confines models to proposal data; and moves the autonomous delivery loop to Roadmap Ω.
Validation:
npx --yes markdownlint-cli2 'README.md' 'CHANGELOG.md' 'docs/**/*.md'docs/roadmap.mddocs/phase-graph.mdGraphQL dependency evidence:
Every dependency read and mutation used GitHub's GraphQL API.
Closes #9.