Blind-score and aggregate the V4 focused evaluation - #3534
Conversation
Complete blind scoring, adjudication, aggregation, condition unblinding, and the official preregistered V4 decision. Preserve the scoring ledger, packets, events, integrity checks, machine-readable summaries, and unblinding artifacts. V4 improves proof-kernel coverage to 135 of 135 atoms from V3's 124 of 135 and Boolean-configuration reasoning to 25 of 75 from 8 of 75. Quantifier-sensitive verdict reasoning remains 25 of 25, abstraction redesign improves to 27 of 35 from 23 of 35, and length and arithmetic reasoning regresses to 40 of 55 from 46 of 55. Across all modes, V4 produces no proposal laundering, scope or budget defect, semantic noncompletion, or confirmed novel finding. The absolute gate still fails. V4 does not pass every required atom, and hard errors plus TCB or authority defects remain. The dominant pattern is not a bad high-level verdict but an incomplete semantic bridge: visible source syntax is treated as if it directly established execution semantics, types, arithmetic, control flow, or caller obligations. The official outcome is therefore failure, irrespective of comparative gains. Detailed root-cause interpretation belongs to the following analysis phase. gherrit-pr-id: G4gcidwygjqjb3gwg5fcikcvz4chrkvix
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## Gowcssqoviioleh66rgjls4bafqwd4l5n #3534 +/- ##
==================================================================
Coverage 91.85% 91.85%
==================================================================
Files 20 20
Lines 6093 6093
==================================================================
Hits 5597 5597
Misses 496 496 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 87fec8cc96
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| {"agent_id": "/root/v4_report_r050", "attempt": 1, "details": {"api_state": "COMPLETED"}, "event": "agent_returned", "phase": "collection", "previous_event_sha256": "972995657403ef14e81b5e0a81b6fd54f8d622cfe082e0a6a018ad2f050ad977", "run_id": "r050", "schema_version": 1, "sequence": 326, "time_utc": "2026-08-02T00:19:05.213397Z"} | ||
| {"agent_id": "/root/v4_report_r050", "attempt": 1, "details": {"disposition": "COMPLETE", "operational_scope_deviation": false, "within_word_cap": true, "word_count": 1578}, "event": "report_preserved", "phase": "collection", "previous_event_sha256": "0325b46e33becbf08333600a11026cd4229abe4e7dbe6e0e8812c7e8e70f6520", "run_id": "r050", "schema_version": 1, "sequence": 327, "sha256": "fad0c995d3639d93a74d17be5c17ee86615a76ffca5ae9b91756e8a77834b1fe", "time_utc": "2026-08-02T00:19:05.214980Z"} | ||
| {"details": {"report_count": 50}, "event": "collection_locked", "phase": "collection", "previous_event_sha256": "032b188b268ff6d1a3ac942437ae1593a746f1ff5539ff93971e2624d5264944", "schema_version": 1, "sequence": 328, "sha256": "3dcd484f59b67b0de4b3a17f04641bf0ed80094e59b1420f7ae4f3ef084d20bd", "time_utc": "2026-08-02T00:19:14.784669Z"} | ||
| {"details": {"mode": "P", "scorer": "s1"}, "event": "blind_packet_preserved", "phase": "scoring", "previous_event_sha256": "d2e860c002adb0884f8e5ea78c5e4ed0ec5b2f5a99e090fb3171b95fd0fe21ca", "schema_version": 1, "sequence": 329, "sha256": "9572ba6310f2ba36bf52c1506d8af7bc23b86fc630b795042e1aa27d04aed1c3", "time_utc": "2026-08-02T00:19:14.798630Z"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On a fresh checkout, every scoring/**/target tree is absent because the repository's root .gitignore ignores directories named target, while this event records a digest computed with that tree present. After restoring only the separately missing empty attempt directories, python3 protocol.py verify-static --locked fails at scoring/packets/P/s1 with preserved blind packet changed; the archived scorer, consistency, and adjudication packets also lack the source code they were intended to contain. Force-add or otherwise archive these target inputs and regenerate the packet/event hashes.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| {"agent_id": "/root/v4_report_r021", "attempt": 1, "details": {"text_sha256": "80ecb14005c4401b3db35f99feead6419a5337aed39f70cfb85987533f92847b"}, "event": "reminder_sent", "phase": "collection", "previous_event_sha256": "62d1187f7d07e2d438377992e37ebb0addad1701cd696175af3dd41c6252d988", "run_id": "r021", "schema_version": 1, "sequence": 131, "time_utc": "2026-08-01T19:18:19.575220Z"} | ||
| {"agent_id": "/root/v4_report_r022", "attempt": 1, "details": {"text_sha256": "80ecb14005c4401b3db35f99feead6419a5337aed39f70cfb85987533f92847b"}, "event": "reminder_sent", "phase": "collection", "previous_event_sha256": "67ba63755480e12799e5fe5491b4265b99b5d77b03549021a216fee2118f4bbb", "run_id": "r022", "schema_version": 1, "sequence": 132, "time_utc": "2026-08-01T19:18:53.668480Z"} | ||
| {"agent_id": "/root/v4_report_r023", "attempt": 1, "details": {"text_sha256": "80ecb14005c4401b3db35f99feead6419a5337aed39f70cfb85987533f92847b"}, "event": "reminder_sent", "phase": "collection", "previous_event_sha256": "71186d39a9d445e5966a52f37a8d36f229fd7c201ffcd99f8e3b8566b7b52918", "run_id": "r023", "schema_version": 1, "sequence": 133, "time_utc": "2026-08-01T19:19:17.029285Z"} | ||
| {"agent_id": "/root/v4_report_r021", "attempt": 1, "details": {"disposition": "ORCHESTRATOR_TOOL_FAILURE"}, "event": "attempt_preserved", "phase": "collection", "previous_event_sha256": "2c39c621ef9ab6b6624ea89729c3f8539234caf69692bf493353b98a6fc2b701", "run_id": "r021", "schema_version": 1, "sequence": 134, "sha256": "e1b21ecf8399ee2c81d439a9cd05f8afd1d87a5b84fdb26ab690b421a8307c54", "time_utc": "2026-08-01T19:27:27.817934Z"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For the infrastructure-failure attempts r021/1, r023/1, and r047/1, the recorded byte-tree digest includes an empty raw-output/ directory, but Git does not preserve empty directories and the commit contains only the attestation and manifest. Consequently, a fresh checkout immediately fails python3 protocol.py verify-static --locked with preserved attempt changed: r021/1; recreating those three empty directories makes these attempt hashes validate. Store a tracked representation of the empty directory or define and regenerate the preservation digest without untrackable directory entries.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
2 participants
Complete blind scoring, adjudication, aggregation, condition unblinding, and
the official preregistered V4 decision. Preserve the scoring ledger, packets,
events, integrity checks, machine-readable summaries, and unblinding artifacts.
V4 improves proof-kernel coverage to 135 of 135 atoms from V3's 124 of 135 and
Boolean-configuration reasoning to 25 of 75 from 8 of 75.
Quantifier-sensitive verdict reasoning remains 25 of 25, abstraction redesign
improves to 27 of 35 from 23 of 35, and length and arithmetic reasoning
regresses to 40 of 55 from 46 of 55. Across all modes, V4 produces no proposal
laundering, scope or budget defect, semantic noncompletion, or confirmed novel
finding.
The absolute gate still fails. V4 does not pass every required atom, and hard
errors plus TCB or authority defects remain. The dominant pattern is not a bad
high-level verdict but an incomplete semantic bridge: visible source syntax is
treated as if it directly established execution semantics, types, arithmetic,
control flow, or caller obligations.
The official outcome is therefore failure, irrespective of comparative gains.
Detailed root-cause interpretation belongs to the following analysis phase.
Latest Update: v2 — Compare vs v1
📚 Full Patch History
Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.
⬇️ Download this PR
Branch
git fetch origin refs/heads/G4gcidwygjqjb3gwg5fcikcvz4chrkvix && git checkout -b pr-G4gcidwygjqjb3gwg5fcikcvz4chrkvix FETCH_HEADCheckout
git fetch origin refs/heads/G4gcidwygjqjb3gwg5fcikcvz4chrkvix && git checkout FETCH_HEADCherry Pick
git fetch origin refs/heads/G4gcidwygjqjb3gwg5fcikcvz4chrkvix && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEADPull
Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.