SRE-750: Upgrade Yarn to 4.16.0 by indietyp · Pull Request #8811 · hashintel/hash

indietyp · 2026-06-03T08:21:04Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Upgrades Yarn from 4.12.0 to 4.16.0 and cleans up the .yarnrc.yml config.

🔗 Related links

🔍 What does this change?

Bumps packageManager from yarn@4.12.0 to yarn@4.16.0
Lockfile version bumped from 8 to 10 (automatic)
.yarnrc.yml reformatted by the migration (settings alphabetized, spacing normalized)

Notable changes in Yarn 4.12 → 4.16

4.13.0: upgrade-interactive improvements (--mode option, c/r/l bulk selection shortcuts). Fixed foreach ordering when --topological isn't set. Enhanced environment variable expansion in config.

4.14.0: enableScripts: false is now the default (we already set this). exec: protocol now respects enableScripts. approvedGitRepositories introduced (removed in this PR since we have no git deps). PnP watch mode fix. Node 25.7+ ZipFS EBADF fix.

4.15.0: node-modules linker performance improvement: install state is now cached across workspaces, reducing redundant directory scans in monorepos. npmMinimalAgeGate defaults to 1d (we set 5d).

4.16.0: yarn npm stage and staged publishing. Editor SDK support for oxc tooling (PnP only). More Node version EBADF workaround coverage.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

⚠️ Known issues

None.

🐾 Next steps

PnP may be worth re-evaluating: Zed now has official PnP support, and the ZipFS allocation bug has had several fixes since 4.9.0. Needs testing to confirm.
The .yarnrc.yml comment about PnP/Zed/ZipFS could be updated once PnP is retested.

🛡 What tests cover this?

CI will validate that the lockfile and installs work correctly with the new version.

❓ How to test this?

rm -rf node_modules && yarn install
Confirm install completes without errors
Run yarn lint:tsc to verify nothing broke

Detailed version-by-version changelog

4.12.0

npm web login support
Git clone argument fix (-c core.autocrlf=false split into separate args)
JSON Schema fix

4.13.0

upgrade-interactive improvements: --mode option and c/r/l bulk selection shortcuts
Fixed foreach ordering when --topological isn't set
Enhanced environment variable expansion in configuration
npm audit now also runs on patched packages
Registry URL displayed when publishing
Better error when all semver-matching versions are quarantined
Fix for float timestamps in convertToBigIntStats (fslib)

4.14.0

enableScripts: false is now the default (we already set this, no impact)
exec: protocol now respects enableScripts
approvedGitRepositories setting added (removed in this PR, no git deps)
PnP: fix watch mode for files required under PnP
Node 25.7+ EBADF fix by reading CJS source of zip files
yarn why can now specify a version or range
OIDC auth support for CircleCI npm publishing

4.14.1

Widened EBADF fstat version gate to include Node 24.15+

4.15.0

perf: cache install state across workspaces for node-modules linker
npmMinimalAgeGate defaults to 1d (we set 5d, no impact)
Ignore legacy YARN_IGNORE_SCRIPTS env var
Reject dependency names with leading/trailing whitespace (fixes duplicate installs)
pnpm linker: configurable install concurrency
Fix for Unicode paths in patch protocol
PnP: stop using EBADF workaround for Node 26.1.0+

4.16.0

yarn npm stage and staged publishing
Editor SDK support for oxc (oxfmt and oxlint), PnP only
PnP: include Node 22.22.3 in fstat workaround
Stop using EBADF workaround for Node 24.16.0+ (fixed upstream in Node)

vercel · 2026-06-03T08:21:09Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 3, 2026 8:33am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 3, 2026 8:33am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Jun 3, 2026 8:33am

cursor · 2026-06-03T08:21:14Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
Tooling-only change with no application code; main risk is install/CI breakage if the new Yarn or lockfile format misbehaves, which CI is meant to catch.

Overview
Upgrades the monorepo toolchain to Yarn 4.16.0 by pinning packageManager in package.json (with Corepack integrity hash) and refreshing yarn.lock so lockfile metadata moves from version 8 to 10.

.yarnrc.yml is normalized during the bump: the same install settings are kept (node-modules linker, enableScripts: false, npmMinimalAgeGate: 5d, etc.) but ordering/spacing is cleaned up and npmMinimalAgeGate is written as 5d instead of "5d". CI Corepack install already reads packageManager from package.json, so no separate workflow change is required.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 0c66ec7. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

indietyp · 2026-06-03T08:21:22Z

SRE-750: Upgrade Yarn to 4.16.0 #8811 👈 (View in Graphite)
main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Copilot

Pull request overview

This PR upgrades the repository’s Yarn toolchain from 4.12.0 to 4.16.0 and applies the corresponding config/lockfile migrations to keep installs reproducible and consistent across environments.

Changes:

Bumped packageManager in package.json to Yarn 4.16.0 (Corepack-pinned with integrity hash).
Updated yarn.lock metadata to the newer lockfile format version (8 → 10).
Reformatted and normalized .yarnrc.yml (ordering/spacing) while preserving existing settings (e.g., node-modules linker, enableScripts: false, npmMinimalAgeGate).

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
yarn.lock	Lockfile metadata version updated to match Yarn 4.16.x format.
package.json	`packageManager` updated to Yarn 4.16.0 (integrity-pinned).
.yarnrc.yml	Config normalized/alphabetized; settings preserved with equivalent values.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

codecov · 2026-06-03T08:25:28Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.08%. Comparing base (91e50f0) to head (0c66ec7).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8811   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.08%   59.08%           
=======================================
  Files        1343     1343           
  Lines      129731   129731           
  Branches     5866     5866           
=======================================
+ Hits        76651    76652    +1     
+ Misses      52177    52176    -1     
  Partials      903      903

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.41% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`2.81% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.87% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.19% <ø> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.74% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.26% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`79.28% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.53% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`75.69% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`86.94% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.06% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-06-03T08:26:21Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing bm/sre-750-update-yarn-to-416 (0c66ec7) with main (91e50f0)¹}

No successful run was found on main (6e5d8e6) during the generation of this report, so 91e50f0 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

alex-e-leon

Looks fine to me.

github-actions · 2026-06-03T09:44:14Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.418 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 342 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.348 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.886 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.311 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.228 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.085 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.909 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.795 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.879 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.248 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.442 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.069 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.568 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.987 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.128 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.044 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.774 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$55.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$46.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.810 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$50.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$44.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.914 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$63.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 416 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$62.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 440 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.584 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$55.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.394 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 513 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.712 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$47.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 258 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.026 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$323 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.46 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}8.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.484 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 123 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.926 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 149 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$24.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.491 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 154 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.532 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.767 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 131 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.806 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$28.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$37.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$34.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.738 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$36.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$36.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$36.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$35.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 388 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$99.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 596 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$151 \mathrm{ms} \pm 846 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.632 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 805 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 743 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.860 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 723 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 675 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.295 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 582 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.181 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 853 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.092 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 572 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 753 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.493 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 591 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.899 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 764 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.338 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$128 \mathrm{ms} \pm 688 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-32.298 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 940 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.486 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$40.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 220 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.702 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$548 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.30 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

feat: upgrade

9df3ccd

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 3, 2026 08:21

graphite-app Bot assigned indietyp Jun 3, 2026

github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Jun 3, 2026

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of indietyp June 3, 2026 08:21 View session

chore: remove git hosts

0c66ec7

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens June 3, 2026 08:24 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut June 3, 2026 08:25 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash June 3, 2026 08:33 View deployment

indietyp requested review from CiaranMn, TimDiekmann and alex-e-leon June 3, 2026 08:59

alex-e-leon approved these changes Jun 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

indietyp added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 3, 2026

Merged via the queue into main with commit 1726d73 Jun 3, 2026
179 checks passed

indietyp deleted the bm/sre-750-update-yarn-to-416 branch June 3, 2026 09:41

Conversation

indietyp commented Jun 3, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🔍 What does this change?

Notable changes in Yarn 4.12 → 4.16

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

⚠️ Known issues

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

4.12.0

4.13.0

4.14.0

4.14.1

4.15.0

4.16.0

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Jun 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Jun 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

indietyp commented Jun 3, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jun 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

alex-e-leon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

vercel Bot commented Jun 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Jun 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Jun 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading