fix(web-types): fix web types for @ionic/vue - #30782
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
@turansky is attempting to deploy a commit to the Ionic Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
Contributor
Author
|
@brandyscarney could you, please, review these changes? |
OS-jacobbell
approved these changes
Sep 2, 2026
OS-jacobbell
left a comment
OS-jacobbell
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR @turansky! Looks good to me.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
ShaneK
changed the title
@ionic/vue@ionic/vue
Member
|
Thanks for the PR! This has been merged and released in v9.0.2! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the current behavior?
a. Reason - invalid Web Types for
@ionic/vueb. Related issue - WEB-53833
What is the new behavior?
Does this introduce a breaking change?