Skip to content

do not use dedup cache for reprovide queue - #1181

Merged
gammazero merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
no-dedup-provide-queue
Jun 25, 2026
Merged

do not use dedup cache for reprovide queue#1181
gammazero merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
no-dedup-provide-queue

Conversation

@gammazero

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The legacy reprovide is not the default, and the sweeping provide provides its own deduplication. People should use new sweeping provider, and additional resources should not be devoted to the legacy provider.

Closes #1180

The legacy reprovide is not the default, and the sweeping provide provides its own deduplication. People should use new sweeping provider, and additional resources should not be devoted to the legacy provider.

Closes #1180
@gammazero
gammazero requested a review from a team as a code owner June 24, 2026 04:31
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 63.66%. Comparing base (60d59d5) to head (4fb307c).

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1181      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.67%   63.66%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         268      268              
  Lines       26984    26984              
==========================================
- Hits        17181    17180       -1     
+ Misses       8094     8092       -2     
- Partials     1709     1712       +3     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
provider/reprovider.go 57.59% <ø> (ø)

... and 9 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@gammazero gammazero changed the title do not use dedup cache for reprovice queue do not use dedup cache for reprovide queue Jun 25, 2026
@gammazero
gammazero merged commit e67e4cf into main Jun 25, 2026
28 checks passed
@gammazero
gammazero deleted the no-dedup-provide-queue branch June 25, 2026 07:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Determine if deduplication is needed for re-provide queue

1 participant