Skip to content

It is syntactic sugar, not syntax #262

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
iliakan merged 1 commit into from Nov 1, 2017
Merged

It is syntactic sugar, not syntax #262

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion 1-js/01-getting-started/1-intro/article.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Modern tools make the transpilation very fast and transparent, actually allowing

Examples of such languages:

- [CoffeeScript](http://coffeescript.org/) is a "syntax sugar" for JavaScript, it introduces shorter syntax, allowing to write more precise and clear code. Usually Ruby devs like it.
- [CoffeeScript](http://coffeescript.org/) is a "syntactic sugar" for JavaScript, it introduces shorter syntax, allowing to write more precise and clear code. Usually Ruby devs like it.
- [TypeScript](http://www.typescriptlang.org/) is concentrated on adding "strict data typing", to simplify development and support of complex systems. It is developed by Microsoft.
- [Dart](https://www.dartlang.org/) is a standalone language that has its own engine that runs in non-browser environments (like mobile apps). It was initially offered by Google as a replacement for JavaScript, but as of now, browsers require it to be transpiled to JavaScript just like the ones above.

Expand Down