-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
refactor(cms): for-lawyers-page-type #61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces schema modifications for two different sections in the CMS backend. The first change adds a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-website-v2 canceled.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cms-backend/src/api/for-lawyers-page-dispute-resolution-with-kleros-section/content-types/for-lawyers-page-dispute-resolution-with-kleros-section/schema.json (1)
43-44: Consider clarifying the purpose of the new subtitle field.The schema already contains multiple subtitle fields (headerSubtitle, secondSubtitle, thirdSubtitle). Adding another generic
subtitlefield without clear context might lead to confusion. Consider either:
- Renaming to clarify its specific purpose (e.g.,
introSubtitle,mainSubtitle)- Consolidating with existing subtitle fields if it serves a similar purpose
cms-backend/src/api/for-lawyers-page-kleros-enterprise-section/content-types/for-lawyers-page-kleros-enterprise-section/schema.json (1)
63-66: Consider data structure implications.The switch from a relation (
articleLink) to a component (arrowLink) trades off:
- (+) More flexible content structure with the button-link component
- (-) Loss of referential integrity and content reusability provided by relations
Ensure this aligns with your content management requirements and doesn't impact content reuse across pages.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
cms-backend/types/generated/contentTypes.d.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
cms-backend/src/api/for-lawyers-page-dispute-resolution-with-kleros-section/content-types/for-lawyers-page-dispute-resolution-with-kleros-section/schema.json(1 hunks)cms-backend/src/api/for-lawyers-page-kleros-enterprise-section/content-types/for-lawyers-page-kleros-enterprise-section/schema.json(1 hunks)
| "arrowLink": { | ||
| "type": "component", | ||
| "repeatable": false, | ||
| "component": "content.button-link" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Breaking Change: Component exists but migration needed
The content.button-link component exists and is already used by other components in the codebase. While the component integration is valid, this remains a breaking change that requires:
- Data migration for existing
articleLinkrelation data to the newarrowLinkcomponent structure - Frontend code updates to handle the new component-based approach instead of the relation
🔗 Analysis chain
Breaking Change: Verify data migration strategy.
The replacement of articleLink (relation) with arrowLink (component) is a breaking change that requires:
- Data migration strategy for existing content
- Updates to any frontend code relying on the previous relation structure
Let's verify the existence of the required component:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the button-link component exists in the content components
rg -g "*.json" -l "button-link" ./cms-backend/src/components/content/
Length of output: 172
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of found files and search for component definition
echo "=== Content of cta-card.json ==="
cat ./cms-backend/src/components/content/cta-card.json
echo -e "\n=== Content of link-card.json ==="
cat ./cms-backend/src/components/content/link-card.json
# Search for button-link component definition
echo -e "\n=== Searching for button-link component definition ==="
rg -g "*.json" -A 5 '"collectionName": "components_content_button_links"' ./cms-backend/src/components/
Length of output: 2116
alcercu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Summary by CodeRabbit
subtitleattribute to the For Lawyers Dispute Resolution with Kleros sectionarticleLinkwith a newarrowLinkcomponent in the Kleros Enterprise section