Skip to content

Conversation

@tractorss
Copy link
Contributor

@tractorss tractorss commented Jan 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added subtitle attribute to the For Lawyers Dispute Resolution with Kleros section
    • Replaced articleLink with a new arrowLink component in the Kleros Enterprise section

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces schema modifications for two different sections in the CMS backend. The first change adds a subtitle attribute to the dispute resolution section, enabling more descriptive content. The second change involves replacing the articleLink attribute with a new arrowLink component in the Kleros enterprise section, representing a shift in how link-related information is structured and stored.

Changes

File Change Summary
cms-backend/src/api/.../for-lawyers-page-dispute-resolution-with-kleros-section/schema.json Added subtitle attribute of type text
cms-backend/src/api/.../for-lawyers-page-kleros-enterprise-section/schema.json Removed articleLink relation, added arrowLink component

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • alcercu

Poem

🐰 Schema shifts like rabbit hops,
Subtitles bloom, link structure drops
New attributes dance with glee
In CMS's evolving tree
Code rabbits hop, changes take flight! 🌟


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Deploy Preview for kleros-website-v2 canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 36273b6
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-website-v2/deploys/678fc1a328e6e7000928f91f

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cms-backend/src/api/for-lawyers-page-dispute-resolution-with-kleros-section/content-types/for-lawyers-page-dispute-resolution-with-kleros-section/schema.json (1)

43-44: Consider clarifying the purpose of the new subtitle field.

The schema already contains multiple subtitle fields (headerSubtitle, secondSubtitle, thirdSubtitle). Adding another generic subtitle field without clear context might lead to confusion. Consider either:

  1. Renaming to clarify its specific purpose (e.g., introSubtitle, mainSubtitle)
  2. Consolidating with existing subtitle fields if it serves a similar purpose
cms-backend/src/api/for-lawyers-page-kleros-enterprise-section/content-types/for-lawyers-page-kleros-enterprise-section/schema.json (1)

63-66: Consider data structure implications.

The switch from a relation (articleLink) to a component (arrowLink) trades off:

  • (+) More flexible content structure with the button-link component
  • (-) Loss of referential integrity and content reusability provided by relations

Ensure this aligns with your content management requirements and doesn't impact content reuse across pages.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f980676 and 36273b6.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • cms-backend/types/generated/contentTypes.d.ts is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • cms-backend/src/api/for-lawyers-page-dispute-resolution-with-kleros-section/content-types/for-lawyers-page-dispute-resolution-with-kleros-section/schema.json (1 hunks)
  • cms-backend/src/api/for-lawyers-page-kleros-enterprise-section/content-types/for-lawyers-page-kleros-enterprise-section/schema.json (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +63 to +66
"arrowLink": {
"type": "component",
"repeatable": false,
"component": "content.button-link"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Breaking Change: Component exists but migration needed

The content.button-link component exists and is already used by other components in the codebase. While the component integration is valid, this remains a breaking change that requires:

  1. Data migration for existing articleLink relation data to the new arrowLink component structure
  2. Frontend code updates to handle the new component-based approach instead of the relation
🔗 Analysis chain

Breaking Change: Verify data migration strategy.

The replacement of articleLink (relation) with arrowLink (component) is a breaking change that requires:

  1. Data migration strategy for existing content
  2. Updates to any frontend code relying on the previous relation structure

Let's verify the existence of the required component:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the button-link component exists in the content components
rg -g "*.json" -l "button-link" ./cms-backend/src/components/content/

Length of output: 172


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of found files and search for component definition
echo "=== Content of cta-card.json ==="
cat ./cms-backend/src/components/content/cta-card.json
echo -e "\n=== Content of link-card.json ==="
cat ./cms-backend/src/components/content/link-card.json

# Search for button-link component definition
echo -e "\n=== Searching for button-link component definition ==="
rg -g "*.json" -A 5 '"collectionName": "components_content_button_links"' ./cms-backend/src/components/

Length of output: 2116

@kemuru kemuru self-requested a review January 21, 2025 16:15
Copy link
Contributor

@alcercu alcercu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@alcercu alcercu merged commit e467a2d into master Jan 21, 2025
5 checks passed
@alcercu alcercu deleted the refactor/for-lawyers-type branch January 21, 2025 16:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants