Skip to content

DESIGN - Architectural Vision and Design Decisions #702

@krystophny

Description

@krystophny

DESIGN - Product Architecture and Strategic Vision

Sprint #1 Architectural Retrospective - COMPLETED

SPRINT ACHIEVEMENT VALIDATION: Emergency regression fixes successfully completed

ARCHITECTURAL LESSONS CONFIRMED:

Custom Implementation Strategy Validated

  • ZLIB Implementation: Custom implementation successfully debugged and resolved PNG corruption
  • PDF Backend: Custom PDF generation successfully restored proper scaling
  • Coordinate System: Internal transformation algorithms successfully repaired
  • REINFORCEMENT: Dependency independence design philosophy proven effective for debugging and resolution

Repository Contamination Crisis Identified

  • Scale Discovery: 520 build artifacts contaminating repository (vs assumed manageable levels)
  • Root Pollution: 45 files in repository root violating build isolation architecture
  • Systematic Problem: Build system artifact management requires architectural redesign
  • URGENCY: Repository health foundation required before sustainable development

Team Competence Boundaries Established

  • Success Pattern: Focused scope (2 critical issues) achieved excellent results
  • Validation: Multi-agent collaboration (max → sergei → patrick → vicky → max → chris) functions effectively
  • Quality Approach: Independent verification and CI validation prevents fraud
  • CONSTRAINT: Complex scope overwhelms team capabilities, conservative planning required

Core Architecture Principles - Sprint #1 Validation

Dependency Independence (PROVEN EFFECTIVE)

  • Custom ZLIB implementation debugged and restored to working condition
  • Custom PDF coordinate system repaired without external library dependencies
  • Custom PNG generation operational after compression algorithm fixes
  • STRATEGIC DECISION: Continue custom implementation approach for Sprint Add standalone FreeType headers for development-library-free builds #2

Repository Organization (CRISIS REQUIRING FOUNDATION WORK)

Quality Assurance (VALIDATED APPROACH)

Sprint #2 Architectural Strategy - REPOSITORY STABILIZATION

ARCHITECTURAL MISSION: Foundation Recovery for Sustainable Development

SPRINT GOAL: Repository health restoration enabling team success and user trust recovery

EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH: Sprint #1 success (2 items, focused scope) vs historical failures (complex scope), conservative planning required

ARCHITECTURAL RECOVERY PRIORITIES

1. Repository Scale Architecture (Issue #977)

  • EMERGENCY: 177 → <100 files through strategic consolidation
  • METHOD: Systematic merging preserving functionality and test coverage
  • VALIDATION: All consolidated modules maintain original capabilities
  • QUALITY GATE: Post-consolidation test suite 100% pass rate

2. User Documentation Architecture (Issue #978)

  • TRUST RECOVERY: 6 critical README failures fixed through verification testing
  • METHOD: Execute every documented workflow, fix discrepancies
  • VALIDATION: Fresh environment testing confirms accuracy
  • QUALITY GATE: All documentation examples executable by new users

3. Build System Architecture (Issue #979)

  • COMPLEXITY REDUCTION: Single-command build and test success
  • METHOD: Artifact isolation, dependency clarity, path simplification
  • VALIDATION: Clean environment build verification
  • QUALITY GATE: fpm build && fmp test complete success

4. Documentation System Architecture (Issue #980)

  • INFRASTRUCTURE: FORD documentation system stability restoration
  • METHOD: Parser error resolution, GitHub Pages pipeline repair
  • VALIDATION: Clean documentation build without warnings
  • QUALITY GATE: Professional documentation deployment success

5. Core Functionality Architecture (Issue #981)

  • API COMPLETION: Missing documented functionality implementation
  • METHOD: Systematic API gap analysis and implementation
  • VALIDATION: All documented features operational
  • QUALITY GATE: User workflow completion without missing functionality

SPRINT #2 QUALITY ARCHITECTURE

Team Competence Alignment

  • Conservative Scope: 5 issues maximum based on demonstrated capabilities
  • Independent Verification: All work validated by separate team members
  • CI-First Approach: Technical verification before any PR creation
  • Systematic Testing: Comprehensive validation preventing false completion claims

Repository Health Foundation

  • File Organization: Restore architectural compliance (<100 files, <50 per directory)
  • Build Isolation: Eliminate artifact contamination through proper system design
  • Documentation Accuracy: Align promises with reality through verification
  • User Experience: Remove adoption barriers through simplified, working workflows

Custom Implementation Preservation

  • Dependency Independence: All consolidation maintains self-contained approach
  • No External Dependencies: Repository stabilization through internal reorganization only
  • Custom Backend Maintenance: ZLIB, PNG, PDF implementations preserved and improved
  • Architecture Philosophy: Minimal external dependency approach reinforced

Architectural Success Criteria - Sprint #2

REPOSITORY ARCHITECTURE: Organized, maintainable codebase under architectural limits enabling team success
USER TRUST ARCHITECTURE: Accurate, executable documentation enabling user adoption without barriers
BUILD SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE: Reliable, simple build process with proper artifact isolation
DEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTURE: Sustainable development foundation enabling future sprints without crisis management

DEFERRED PRIORITIES: Performance optimization, advanced features, experimental architecture (until foundation stable)

All architectural decisions prioritize: User accessibility, repository maintainability, team competence alignment, dependency independence preservation.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions