-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
[Merged by Bors] - chore: adaptations for nightly-2025-11-02 #103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
* switch to modulized quote4 * increment rootHashGeneration * include .ir files * try minimizing failure * minimize more * use adjusted cache * less minimal * unminimize all * restore --------- Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
…hlib4-nightly-testing into nightly-testing
|
|
| Due to a change in `grind` between `nightly-2025-10-31` and `nightly-2025-11-02`, | ||
| this proof is no longer working. I've temporarily commented it out to get a build of | ||
| `nightly-testing`. | ||
| -/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My understanding was that we now have a working proof again. Do we fix this now or tomorrow?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's best tomorrow. The working proof wasn't into nightly-testing in time for the nightly-testing-2025-11-02 tag. We could choose to abandon this PR and roll everything into tomorrow, if it's too painful to flip back and forth.
| theorem asString_nil : [].asString = "" := | ||
| rfl | ||
|
|
||
| theorem toList_empty : "".toList = [] := |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should the deleted theorems toList_inj and toList_empty be deprecated?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These were upstreamed, not deleted. We don't really have good tooling to explain this automatically at present, beyond pasting them back in and seeing X has already been declared.
kbuzzard
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right at the bottom of the files diff there's a new file lean4checker in the root directoy, and I was not able to leave a github comment on it saying "was this file added intentionally?" for some reason.
fixed, that was my mistake |
|
Modulo the comments this looks ready to merge |
|
bors merge |
Co-authored-by: leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot <leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Markus Himmel <markus@lean-fro.org> Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@github.com>
|
Pull request successfully merged into bump/v4.26.0. Build succeeded: |
No description provided.