[Merged by Bors] - perf(AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine/Point): help elaborator

[kbuzzard]

For some reason Lean likes it much better when we explicitly tell it W, even though it can be figured out through elaboration. Typeclass inference goes off on a completely unnecessary wild goose chase before this figuring-out is done, for some reason.

---

See #mathlib4 > Field (FunctionField ?m.19) @ 💬

[github-actions]

PR summary 043e9e0413

Import changes for modified files

No significant changes to the import graph

Import changes for all files

Files	Import difference

---

Declarations diff

No declarations were harmed in the making of this PR! 🐙

You can run this locally as follows

## from your `mathlib4` directory:
git clone https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib-ci.git ../mathlib-ci

## summary with just the declaration names:
../mathlib-ci/scripts/pr_summary/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>

## more verbose report:
../mathlib-ci/scripts/pr_summary/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>

The doc-module for scripts/pr_summary/declarations_diff.sh in the mathlib-ci repository contains some details about this script.

---

No changes to strong technical debt.

No changes to weak technical debt.

[kbuzzard]

!radar

[leanprover-radar]

Benchmark results for d5965ec against 043e9e0 are in. No significant results found. @kbuzzard

• ✅ build//instructions: -13.5G (-0.01%)

Medium changes (1✅)

• ✅ build/module/Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Affine.Point//instructions: -15.5G (-15.15%)

[Multramate]

LGTM!

[joelriou]

Thanks!

bors merge

[mathlib-bors]

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

• ci (staging) / Build
• ci (staging) / Post-CI job
• ci (staging) / Post-Build Step
• ci (staging) / Lint style