chore(multisig-rollout): proceed optimistically, don't pre-gate on tunnel - #2116
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
WalkthroughThe rollout documentation replaces VPN references with the ChangesRollout guidance
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.agents/commands/multisig-rollout.md:
- Around line 32-33: Update the adjacent Phase 0 failure guidance to refer to
the “lifi-connect tunnel” instead of “VPN,” including any remediation wording,
while preserving the existing optimistic execution guidance and tunnel
dependency.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 9b76c270-6e2c-460d-ab14-1099cd4f3ac7
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.agents/commands/multisig-rollout.mddocs/Setup-agents.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Which Linear task belongs to this PR?
Fixes EXSC-677
Why did I implement it this way?
The
multisig-rolloutskill was opening runs with questions like "given I can't open the prod tunnel / sign, how should we run this?" instead of just executing. The skill's own design already handles this the right way — Phase 0 defers VPN verification (list-pending-proposals.tsexits2with an actionable error if the tunnel is down) and signing is handed off at Phase 6 — but the "Hard rails" +Setup-agents.md"an agent must not open the prod tunnel" guidance was being over-read as "an agent must confirm the tunnel is up before starting." The fix adds an explicit counter-instruction in both places rather than touching any script logic, since the behavior was correct and only the wording invited the premature question. The legitimate gates are untouched: Phase 2 still confirms the plan (gas across many chains) and Phase 6 still hands off Ledger signing.Checklist before requesting a review
Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)