Skip to content

chore(multisig-rollout): proceed optimistically, don't pre-gate on tunnel - #2116

Merged
gvladika merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/exsc-677-multisig-rollout-optimistic-tunnel
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

chore(multisig-rollout): proceed optimistically, don't pre-gate on tunnel#2116
gvladika merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
chore/exsc-677-multisig-rollout-optimistic-tunnel

Conversation

@gvladika

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Which Linear task belongs to this PR?

Fixes EXSC-677

Why did I implement it this way?

The multisig-rollout skill was opening runs with questions like "given I can't open the prod tunnel / sign, how should we run this?" instead of just executing. The skill's own design already handles this the right way — Phase 0 defers VPN verification (list-pending-proposals.ts exits 2 with an actionable error if the tunnel is down) and signing is handed off at Phase 6 — but the "Hard rails" + Setup-agents.md "an agent must not open the prod tunnel" guidance was being over-read as "an agent must confirm the tunnel is up before starting." The fix adds an explicit counter-instruction in both places rather than touching any script logic, since the behavior was correct and only the wording invited the premature question. The legitimate gates are untouched: Phase 2 still confirms the plan (gas across many chains) and Phase 6 still hands off Ledger signing.

Checklist before requesting a review

Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)

  • I have checked that any arbitrary calls to external contracts are validated and or restricted
  • I have checked that any privileged calls (i.e. storage modifications) are validated and or restricted
  • I have ensured that any new contracts have had AT A MINIMUM 1 preliminary audit conducted on by <company/auditor>

@lifi-action-bot
lifi-action-bot marked this pull request as draft July 24, 2026 08:02
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 823b3eb9-d0c6-4e12-9fcc-1d3412dbf0f0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3fda546 and b7cb995.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .agents/commands/multisig-rollout.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .agents/commands/multisig-rollout.md

Walkthrough

The rollout documentation replaces VPN references with the lifi-connect tunnel, instructs agents to proceed without upfront tunnel or signing checks, documents fail-fast MongoDB errors, and defers signing to Phase 6.

Changes

Rollout guidance

Layer / File(s) Summary
Optimistic execution instructions
.agents/commands/multisig-rollout.md, docs/Setup-agents.md
Phase 0 and non-interactive shell instructions remove upfront tunnel and signing checks, use fail-fast command errors, consistently reference lifi-connect, and defer signing to Phase 6.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • lifinance/contracts#2052: Aligns Safe/MongoDB workflow documentation with lifi-connect tunnel handling and fail-fast behavior.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title is concise and accurately summarizes the main change to multisig-rollout tunnel handling.
Description check ✅ Passed The description includes all required template sections, a linked Linear task, rationale, and both checklists.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/exsc-677-multisig-rollout-optimistic-tunnel

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@gvladika
gvladika marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2026 08:30
@gvladika
gvladika enabled auto-merge (squash) July 24, 2026 08:30

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.agents/commands/multisig-rollout.md:
- Around line 32-33: Update the adjacent Phase 0 failure guidance to refer to
the “lifi-connect tunnel” instead of “VPN,” including any remediation wording,
while preserving the existing optimistic execution guidance and tunnel
dependency.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 9b76c270-6e2c-460d-ab14-1099cd4f3ac7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 036ba5c and 3fda546.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .agents/commands/multisig-rollout.md
  • docs/Setup-agents.md

Comment thread .agents/commands/multisig-rollout.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@gvladika
gvladika merged commit c2af158 into main Jul 24, 2026
46 of 49 checks passed
@gvladika
gvladika deleted the chore/exsc-677-multisig-rollout-optimistic-tunnel branch July 24, 2026 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants