A Claude Code skill that turns a code change into one self-contained HTML page that teaches a reader what changed and why.
This started from Geoffrey Litt's explain-diff gist,
which set out the four-section structure, the quiz, the self-contained HTML
output, and the skill's name. This version adds flow-ordered walkthroughs,
verified file:line anchors at the target ref, Mermaid diagrams with
validation, a provenance line, and a set of checks built from specific
failures.
AI is helping us write code faster than ever.
That's great, but there's also a side effect: we're generating more code, reviewing bigger changes, and sometimes understanding less of what actually happened.
You open a PR and suddenly there are hundreds, maybe thousands, of changed lines across a bunch of files.
Git shows you the diff file by file.
controller.ts
service.ts
utils.ts
tests...
But that's usually not how the change actually works.
So where do you start?
Which file matters first? What calls what? Why was the change needed? How does the data move through the system?
And that's where PR reviews can start becoming difficult.
For me, PRs have always been one of the best ways to learn a codebase. You look at someone else's changes, follow the flow, understand why they made certain decisions, and slowly build a better mental model of the system.
As AI generates more of the implementation and PRs keep getting larger, I didn't want to lose that learning opportunity.
That's where explain-diff-html came from.
Instead of explaining a change in the order Git happens to show the files, it tries to follow the logical flow of the code.
So instead of:
file A → file B → file C
it might explain it as:
request → handler → service → transformation → result
It looks at the diff, the surrounding code, callers, related definitions, commits, and documentation, then turns all of that into a walkthrough that tries to answer a simple question:
"If I actually want to understand this PR, where should I start and how does everything connect?"
And it's not limited to PRs.
If you're investigating a bug, you can ask the skill to do a root cause analysis, bug investigation, or bug identification report as additional context.
The skill can use that alongside the actual code changes to connect the reported issue with the implementation and explain not just what changed, but also what went wrong, where it went wrong, and why the fix works.
If you already have an RCA or investigation report from your team, you can provide that too.
The goal isn't just to tell you what changed.
The goal is to help make PR reviews, debugging, and code investigation a learning opportunity again.
Point it at a pull request, a branch, or a commit range. It reads the diff, then reads the code around the diff, then writes a single page with four sections:
- Background, on the system the change lands in, with the beginner-level part collapsed so a familiar reader can skip it.
- Intuition, on the core idea, with toy data and diagrams rather than full detail.
- Code walkthrough, ordered by the path a request or an action takes through the system, not by filename.
- Quiz, five interactive multiple-choice questions that test whether the reader understood why the change is shaped the way it is.
The output is one HTML file with the CSS and JavaScript inline. It opens with a double click, reads on a phone, and follows the reader's light or dark system theme. Nothing needs a server, a build step, or a network round trip, with one exception.
That exception is Mermaid, the diagramming library these pages use for state, entity-relationship, sequence, and flow diagrams. A page carrying one of those loads Mermaid from a CDN, so it needs network for those diagrams to draw. Everything else on the page, including the hand-built diagrams and the quiz, works offline.
Limitations below sets out what it deliberately does not do.
Seven samples across three languages, each explaining a merged pull request in a public repository.
The Page links go to the rendered pages on GitHub Pages. Opening the same files
from the samples/ directory in this repository shows their HTML source
instead, because GitHub serves .html as code rather than rendering it.
| Page | Repository | Pull request | What it teaches |
|---|---|---|---|
| PR 11305 | TanStack/query, TypeScript | 11305 | A ?.field guard answering two questions at once, so falsy errors never reached the error boundary |
| PR 11242 | TanStack/query, TypeScript | 11242 | A guard that reset only on the happy path, and why the fix uses finally with no catch |
| PR 16102 | fastapi/fastapi, Python | 16102 | A three-valued option collapsed at the public boundary, and the stack depth a warning depends on |
| PR 16013 | fastapi/fastapi, Python | 16013 | Double-checked locking and build-then-publish, and why the list is assigned before the version |
| PR 2924 | uPortal, Java | 2924 | A catch that logs and falls through, and an @Ignore that had been skipping 30 tests |
| PR 2945 | uPortal, Java | 2945 | Picking the type that matches the intent, so a static-analysis suppression stops being needed |
| PR 2983 | uPortal, Java | 2983 | An implicit path attribute made explicit, moving resolution from the server to the browser |
Each page has been through two checks: a read-only pass that re-opens every
cited file:line at the pull request head and tries to falsify each claim, and
a cold read of the prose against the writing rules in SKILL.md, the file that
defines the skill.
| Tool | Needed when | Used for |
|---|---|---|
git |
Every run | Resolving the base, fetching the ref, reading the diff |
gh |
Explaining a pull request | Fetching the pull request title, body, and URL |
node |
Every run that carries a Mermaid diagram | Validating Mermaid sources in step 4, through npx |
gh must be authenticated, not only installed. Check with gh auth status.
Node is a build-time validator only. Nobody needs Node to open a finished page, because the reader's browser loads Mermaid from the CDN.
The skill's commands are POSIX shell, so it runs on Linux and macOS directly,
and on Windows through WSL or Git Bash. Windows PowerShell and cmd.exe are not
supported: they have no command -v, no $(...) substitution, and none of
mktemp, sed, or openssl. The generated page itself is plain HTML and opens
in any browser on any platform.
The repository root is the skill, so cloning it into place is the whole install.
For every project you work on:
git clone https://github.com/malav2110/explain-diff-html.git \
~/.claude/skills/explain-diff-htmlFor one project only, committed alongside the code so your team gets it too:
git clone https://github.com/malav2110/explain-diff-html.git \
<your-repo>/.claude/skills/explain-diff-htmlClaude Code reads SKILL.md. The README.md and samples/ directory sit in
the same folder and are ignored, so nothing needs moving or deleting.
Confirm the install by asking Claude Code to list its skills, or by running
/skill-doctor if your version has it. explain-diff-html should appear with
its description.
Ask in plain language. The skill triggers on phrasing like this:
explain PR 1234
explain this diff
walk me through this branch
explain the changes between abc123 and def456
It writes the page to a code-explanations folder in your home directory,
$HOME/code-explanations, named
YYYY-MM-DD-<KEY>-explanation.html, and reports the path. The date comes first
so the files sort by time, and the key comes second so you can grep for a ticket
or a pull request later. <KEY> is an issue key such as PROJ-1234 when the
branch name carries one, otherwise pr-1234, otherwise a short slug.
Output lands outside the repository on purpose. An explanation is not a project artifact, and writing it into the working tree invites committing it by accident.
It explains a change. It does not critique one.
The page will not tell you whether the change is correct, whether the approach is right, or what to fix. There are no findings, no severity ratings, and no verdict anywhere in it. Read it to understand a pull request before you review it, or to learn a codebase from changes someone else made. The reviewing is still yours.
The page also describes the pull request in whatever form it has when you run the skill. It is a snapshot of one diff at one ref. If the author pushes three more commits afterwards, the page still describes what it read, and nothing in it updates. Generate a new page rather than trusting an old one.
One more thing to know: it explains what the record supports. Where the reasoning behind a change is not in the diff, the commits, the pull request body, or the repository's own documents, the page says so rather than inventing a motive.
SKILL.md drives Claude Code through eight steps. In outline:
- Resolve the target and the filename key, detecting the repository's default
branch rather than assuming
main. - Gather context: the code around the diff, the pull request body, the commit messages, and any design records the repository keeps.
- Draft the four sections, walking the code in flow order.
- Build the diagrams, from three dependency-free HTML and CSS families plus Mermaid for state, entity-relationship, and sequence shapes.
- Write the quiz to the question shapes that test transfer rather than recall.
- Hand the prose to a fresh reader for an editing pass, because an author misses its own tells.
- Run the self-check, including re-reading every cited
file:lineat the target ref. - Write the file.
Step 7 carries two checks that exist because of specific failures. It confirms
every code block is HTML-escaped, because a single raw < in a pasted diff line
opens an element HTML never closes, which swallows the rest of the document and
breaks every anchor below it. It also re-reads each cited line at the target
ref, because a stale ref produces line numbers that look right and point at
nothing.
Everything visual lives in html-template.html, which the skill fills in rather
than rebuilding per run:
- Colors are CSS custom properties at the top, in a light set and a dark set. Change the two blocks to match your own palette.
- The three hand-built diagram families are plain markup: a simplified UI mockup, a data-flow diagram with example payloads on the arrows, and a node tree for recursive structures.
- The Mermaid loader pins an exact version and checks it with a Subresource
Integrity hash. To change versions, edit the
@x.y.zin thesrcand recompute the hash.SKILL.mdcarries the command. A stale hash makes the browser block the script and the diagrams then fail silently. - The output directory and the filename pattern are in
SKILL.md, under the output contract.
MIT. See LICENSE.
