[5/n tensor engine] ProcMesh activate() / mock slicing #264
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
See test_python_actor.py for an example. DeviceMesh is hidden inside of ProcMesh wrapper, so that you can use ProcMesh as the way to tell the tensor engine what to do. Currently we cannot spawn sliced proc meshes so we have to fake the slicing behavior for ProcMesh to allow it to stil be used as a sliced mesh for the purpose of the tensor engine. Differential Revision: [D76556227](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76556227/) [ghstack-poisoned]
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76556227 |
See test_python_actor.py for an example. DeviceMesh is hidden inside of ProcMesh wrapper, so that you can use ProcMesh as the way to tell the tensor engine what to do. Currently we cannot spawn sliced proc meshes so we have to fake the slicing behavior for ProcMesh to allow it to stil be used as a sliced mesh for the purpose of the tensor engine. Differential Revision: [D76556227](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76556227/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zdevito
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2025
Pull Request resolved: #264 See test_python_actor.py for an example. DeviceMesh is hidden inside of ProcMesh wrapper, so that you can use ProcMesh as the way to tell the tensor engine what to do. Currently we cannot spawn sliced proc meshes so we have to fake the slicing behavior for ProcMesh to allow it to stil be used as a sliced mesh for the purpose of the tensor engine. ghstack-source-id: 290350180 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D76556227](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76556227/)
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76556227 |
See test_python_actor.py for an example. DeviceMesh is hidden inside of ProcMesh wrapper, so that you can use ProcMesh as the way to tell the tensor engine what to do. Currently we cannot spawn sliced proc meshes so we have to fake the slicing behavior for ProcMesh to allow it to stil be used as a sliced mesh for the purpose of the tensor engine. Differential Revision: [D76556227](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76556227/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This was referenced Jun 16, 2025
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76556227 |
See test_python_actor.py for an example. DeviceMesh is hidden inside of ProcMesh wrapper, so that you can use ProcMesh as the way to tell the tensor engine what to do. Currently we cannot spawn sliced proc meshes so we have to fake the slicing behavior for ProcMesh to allow it to stil be used as a sliced mesh for the purpose of the tensor engine. Differential Revision: [D76556227](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76556227/) [ghstack-poisoned]
zdevito
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2025
Pull Request resolved: #264 See test_python_actor.py for an example. DeviceMesh is hidden inside of ProcMesh wrapper, so that you can use ProcMesh as the way to tell the tensor engine what to do. Currently we cannot spawn sliced proc meshes so we have to fake the slicing behavior for ProcMesh to allow it to stil be used as a sliced mesh for the purpose of the tensor engine. ghstack-source-id: 290789083 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D76556227](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76556227/)
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D76556227 |
Contributor
|
This pull request has been merged in 9ce3714. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
See test_python_actor.py for an example.
DeviceMesh is hidden inside of ProcMesh wrapper, so that you can use ProcMesh as the way to tell the tensor engine what to do.
Currently we cannot spawn sliced proc meshes so we have to fake the slicing behavior for ProcMesh to allow it to stil be used as a sliced mesh for the purpose of the tensor engine.
Differential Revision: D76556227