[DSD-9417] move images from dev2 to qa

[gaganamadival]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Edited image reference entries but resulted in no net change to container image tags or exported/public declarations; no functional impact observed.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

No net functional change: release/vidivi/images.txt shows the same mosipdev2/dsl-packetcreator:release-1.3.x line removed and re-added, and the file ends without a trailing newline.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Image file no-op edit release/vidivi/images.txt	A single line mosipdev2/dsl-packetcreator:release-1.3.x was removed and re-added (no net change); file ends without a trailing newline.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Inspect release/vidivi/images.txt to confirm the removal/addition are identical and the lack of newline is intentional.

Possibly related PRs

• [DSD-9175] mosipdev2 to mosipqa #1351: Touches the same mosipdev2/dsl-packetcreator entry and performs related edits.
• [DSD-9186]move images from dev2 to qa #1350: Modifies release/vidivi/images.txt and includes the same image entry.
• [DSD-9280] move from dev2 to qa #1402: Adjusts the dsl-packetcreator image/registry/tag in the same file.

Suggested reviewers

• Prafulrakhade
• ckm007

Poem

🐰
I nudged a line, then nudged it back,
A quiet hop along the track.
Same footprint in the file I leave,
A tiny tweak — then take my leave. 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The PR title states 'move images from dev2 to qa', but the raw summary shows no observable change to image entries and the patch shows removal and addition of the same line with no net difference.	Verify if actual image migration occurred. If no net changes exist, update the title to reflect the actual state of changes, or clarify the intended changes in the PR description.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb1cd18 and c1056e8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• release/vidivi/images.txt (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• release/vidivi/images.txt

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b6b98e and bb1cd18.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• release/vidivi/images.txt (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

release/vidivi/images.txt (2)

1-2: Verify image replacement and version compatibility.

The change replaces inji-certify-with-plugins:release-0.13.x with two new images (dsl-orchestrator and dsl-packetcreator) and bumps versions to 1.3.x. Please verify:

1. That dsl-orchestrator and dsl-packetcreator are the correct functional replacements for inji-certify-with-plugins.
2. That the version bump from 0.13.x to 1.3.x is intentional and compatible with other components.
3. That there are no breaking changes introduced by this replacement.

---

1-2: No action needed — images were correctly transferred to mosipqa.

The images.txt format is source-image:source-tag destination-tag, where the first part specifies the source registry and the second part is the destination tag. The mosipdev2 reference indicates the source, not the destination. The transfer report confirms both images were successfully transferred to mosipqa registry as intended by the PR objective "[DSD-9417] move images from dev2 to qa".