Main merge dev #386
Merged
Main merge dev #386
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
To align with changes in neo-technology/neo4j#29493
Instead of PR neo4j#253 --------- Co-authored-by: Louise Söderström <louise.matematik@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Louise Berglund <louise.berglund@neo4j.com>
Co-authored-by: Louise Berglund <louise.berglund@neo4j.com>
This error's link (https://neo4j.com/docs/status-codes/current/errors/gql-errors/#_42n26) is not working because it's not listed in the content-nav file due to a typo.
I hope I did this right - here is the accompanying implementation neo-technology/neo4j#29934
Co-authored-by: Lasse Heemann <7661319+l-heemann@users.noreply.github.com>
…22N06, 42N08, 51N12, 51N27 (neo4j#282) Co-authored-by: Louise Berglund <louise.berglund@neo4j.com> Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
New error used for parsing the vector value constructor function --------- Co-authored-by: Louise Berglund <louise.berglund@neo4j.com>
As this change will not be visible to the user when they get the error, I opted for not including it in changelog/mark as changed in 2025.04. Let me know if you think otherwise. Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
Adapting to neo-technology/neo4j#30353 Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
Causing broken link. It's also being addressed in the main branch using this PR neo4j#293, so no need to cherry-pick it.
Co-authored-by: Louise Berglund <louise.berglund@neo4j.com>
To reflect change made in neo-technology/neo4j#30521
Codes needed to cover errors left over in deperected constructors. [Monorepo PR](neo-technology/neo4j#30680). --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
Introduced in neo-technology/neo4j#30884 --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
This came out of a discussion here neo-technology/neo4j#31828 (comment) --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
Co-authored-by: Lidia Zuin <102308961+lidiazuin@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Louise Berglund <louise.berglund@neo4j.com> Co-authored-by: NataliaIvakina <82437520+NataliaIvakina@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: JoelBergstrand <joel.bergstrand@hotmail.com> Co-authored-by: Hannes Voigt <30618026+hvub@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Nick Giles <100630647+nick-giles-neo@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Therese Magnusson <therese.magnusson@neotechnology.com> Co-authored-by: ConorNeo <121866402+ConorNeo@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Balazs Lendvai <56266523+gfx54b@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Satia Herfert <satiaherfert@gmx.de>
Added a new error: neo-technology/neo4j#31206 --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
The errors have already been merged. The deprecations come from neo-technology/neo4j#31541 --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
Adds error for [PR](neo-technology/neo4j#31952) - unsupported aggregation in NEXT.
Related [PR](neo-technology/neo4j#31804) --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
See neo-technology/neo4j#31623 --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
Introduced in neo-technology/neo4j#31849 --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
…to the corresponding constraint errors (neo4j#338) Updated in neo-technology/neo4j#31435 (merged the day after cutoff for 2025.06) --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
Rename 42I64 to unsupported operation [Neo4j PR](neo-technology/neo4j#32037) --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
Introduced in: neo-technology/neo4j#31819 --------- Co-authored-by: Natalia Ivakina <82437520+NataliaIvakina@users.noreply.github.com>
Error codes introduced in [PR Formatting temporals](neo-technology/neo4j#32184) --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
Adds error 42I67 introduced in [PR](https://github.com/pulls) --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
Since text-2.0 index provider is legacy now. Also, fix the message:) --------- Co-authored-by: Natalia Ivakina <82437520+NataliaIvakina@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
This status represents invalid elements on Packstream messages. --------- Co-authored-by: Reneta Popova <reneta.popova@neo4j.com>
|
Thanks for the documentation updates. The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
19 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.