Local-first, git-friendly, node-based flow editor and engine for complex API request/response processing — think "Postman Flows, but open, file-based, Python-powered, and composable." Built for QA and dev teams who test APIs and want their flows reviewed, diffed, and run in CI like any other code.
Status: v0.2.0 — usable full-fidelity developer preview.
The file format, validator, CLI, headless engine (full node catalog), and
the visual canvas (edit, run, inspect, history) work end to end on
macOS, Windows, and Linux. All v0.x formats—including the current
schema: napflow/v1 marker—are experimental and may change before
v1.0. napflow assumes trusted workspaces (flows run real Python on
your machine) and is localhost-only. The v0.2 implementation, reusable
release gate, compatibility audit, and prepared-artifact dry-run are complete.
See the
v0.2 compatibility notes and
plan (D33–D40).
- Git-friendly — a flow is one YAML file + one
nodes.pyin one folder; diffs are small and reviewable, canvas layout never pollutes logic diffs. - Composable — any flow is usable as a node inside another flow (by reference, never copy). Every canvas is a flow.
- Python-native — response parsing/logic are real Python functions,
testable with pytest; the engine is importable
(
from napflow.core import ...). - CI-first — headless
napf runwith assert-driven exit codes is a first-class citizen, not an afterthought. - Full observability — request/response detail (headers, bodies, timing, retries) captured in run history; v0.2 stores repeated large values once in hash-verified blobs with no destructive capture limits and records the effective prepared request.
| Command | Status | Does |
|---|---|---|
napf init |
✅ | scaffold a minimal workspace; --example adds runnable references; roots are configurable |
napf list |
✅ | discovered flows with their input/output ports |
napf check |
✅ | validate everything — schema, edges, guards, references, env — with path-specific diagnostics and CI exit codes |
napf run |
✅ | headless engine — full node catalog incl. python worker, full-value JSONL/blob history, prepared requests, exit codes 0/1/2/130 |
napf ui |
✅ | visual canvas on localhost — edit flows (autosaved through the canonical serializer, clean diffs), edit nodes.py in-browser, run with live animated events + full request/response detail, replay bounded history pages with lazy blob detail, drill into completed frame canvases, clone shared flows |
Raw history warning:
.napflow/runs/may contain complete request and response headers/bodies, cookies, credentials, bearer tokens, log values, and flow outputs. Greenfieldnapf initcreates the root ignore rule; interactive brownfield init asks before appending to an existing LF.gitignore(or accepts explicit--git-meta append) and leaves skipped/CRLF files unchanged.napf checkwarns with advisory W108/W109, but Git metadata is not sanitization or access control. Do not commit, upload, attach, publish, or otherwise share this directory unless inspected. Terminal/report masking does not modify the canonical JSONL or blob files.
Needs Python 3.12+; simplest with uv:
uv tool install napflow
napf init my-flows && cd my-flows
napf check
napf ui # opens the canvas in your browserThe default scaffold is intentionally small: one empty flows/main, an empty
data/ directory, and no environment files. For the complete runnable
reference workspace used by napflow's own smoke and browser tests:
napf init example-flows --example && cd example-flows
napf check
napf run flows/smoke # headless, fully offlineEmbedding napflow in an existing repository? See Embedding a workspace for configurable roots and collision-safe init examples.
Install from PyPI or a GitHub release artifact (wheel or sdist). Direct VCS (
git+https) installs and PEP 517 builds from a raw source checkout are unsupported: the generated UI bundle is deliberately not committed. Release artifacts contain the pre-built bundle; users never need Node.
The functional and workspace-bound forms create independent runs through the
same core path—without importing the CLI or server. This example uses the
flows/smoke reference created by napf init --example:
from pathlib import Path
from napflow.core import load_workspace, run_flow
workspace = load_workspace(Path("."))
bound_result = workspace.flows.smoke.run(history=False)
functional_result = run_flow(workspace, "flows/smoke", history=False)
assert bound_result.state == functional_result.state == "passed"schema: napflow/v1
flow:
name: example
nodes:
- id: start
type: start
config:
ports:
- {name: base_url, type: string, default: "{{ env.BASE_URL }}"}
- id: get_echo
type: request
config: {url: "{{ inputs.base_url }}/get"}
- id: verify
type: assert
config:
checks:
- {kind: status, equals: 200}
- id: end
type: end
config: {ports: [{name: response}]}
edges:
- {from: start.out, to: get_echo.trigger}
- {from: get_echo.response, to: verify.in}
- {from: verify.passed, to: end.response}Message-driven, not a DAG: nodes fire when messages arrive, retry cycles
are legal (guarded by counter/timeout nodes), errors travel on
error ports as data, and an unproduced required output fails the run —
no false greens.
| Doc | What it pins |
|---|---|
| napflow-flow-schema.md | flow.yaml format + the full node catalog |
| napflow-workspace-manifest.md | napflow.yaml, CLI surface, env model |
| napflow-engine-spec.md | scheduler, frames, firing rules, events, check rules |
| yaml-profile.md | the canonical YAML read/emit profile |
| DECISIONS.md / EDGE_CASES.md | why, and what almost went wrong |
| PLAN.md / JOURNAL.md | roadmap + working journal |
| RELEASING.md | versioning scheme + release flow |
uv sync
uv run pytest # test suite
uv run ruff check # lint
uv run lint-imports # architecture contract: core imports nothing from cli/serverUI (dev-time only — users get the pre-built bundle inside the wheel):
cd ui
npm ci
npm run build # bundle → src/napflow/server/static (what `napf ui` serves)
npm run dev # Vite dev server, proxies /api + /ws to a running `napf ui`
npm run e2e # Playwright against the built bundle (needs npm run build)Contributor builds from a checkout must build the UI before packaging. This is a development workflow, not a supported installation path; published release sdists already contain the generated bundle and build wheels without Node.
Conventional commits (type(scope): subject) — they feed the
git-cliff changelog.