docs(pm-dispatch): X0 quote policy — date pointers for non-operative maintainer quotations (item 2 of the skills batch, ruling B) - #14911
Draft
os-litant wants to merge 11 commits into
Draft
Conversation
…th date pointers Execute the X0 quote policy on the PM skill's main file: at every pointer-eligible site the verbatim maintainer quotation (and the lead-in that only introduced it) becomes the date pointer `（YYYY-MM-DD 裁定）`, with the rule stated by the surrounding text. The five KEEP sites whose words are themselves the operative criterion keep their quotes; the frame paragraph sites are untouched; the one undated quote is kept (NODATE). No issue number, comment id or URL is written; check-skill-id-lint keeps enforcing the 2026-08-12 convention. 989 -> 964 lines, shrink-only, no untouched line re-wrapped. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1
…h a date pointer Same policy as the SKILL.md commit, applied to the dev-agent definition: the two-sentence 2026-08-21 quotation in the published-skills clause becomes `（2026-08-21 裁定）`; the two ratchet-currency quotes and the frame-block quote are operative criteria and stay verbatim. 469 -> 468 lines, shrink-only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1
… stage 2) Same quote policy as the SKILL.md commit, applied whole-file: nine non-operative maintainer quotations become `（YYYY-MM-DD 裁定）`; the 2026-08-27 transcript-verification quote stays verbatim because the quoted phrase is the sentence's subject. 65 -> 64 lines. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1
…X0 stage 2) Four non-operative quotations become date pointers; the 2026-09-01 numeric weight criterion stays verbatim (same KEEP as in SKILL.md). The heading's "裁决原话与归席见主文件" pointer drops 原话 because the words it pointed at were converted in the SKILL.md commit. 54 -> 53 lines. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1
…0 stage 2) Nine 出处 quotations (maintainer questions and one-word replies whose rules live in the main file or the section body) become date pointers; the "出处原话逐字住主文件「两级盘点」条" pointer drops 原话逐字 because that quotation was converted in the SKILL.md commit. 280 -> 273 lines. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1
…(X0 stage 2) The two 2026-08-25 「同意」 quotations become date pointers. 80 -> 80 lines. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1
…stage 2) Eight non-operative quotations become date pointers; the 2026-08-27 authorization sentence stays verbatim because the file declares it to be the seat's duty definition itself. The "(原话见主文件总监段)" pointer drops 原话 because that quotation was converted in the SKILL.md commit. 77 -> 72 lines. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1
…(X0 stage 2) The two 2026-08-27 「落协议」 sites (one with its proposal fragment) become date pointers. 105 -> 104 lines. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1
Six pointer phrases sent readers to verbatim words that the stage-1 and stage-2 commits converted to date pointers; each drops the 原话 limb in place (no rule text changes, no line re-wrapped). 964 -> 964 lines. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1
github-actions
Bot
added
size/m
documentation
os-litant
added
skip-changeset
Claude
This was referenced Sep 3, 2026
…e date-pointer form Seat review increment: the four on-surface sentences that still described provenance as date + verbatim now state the form the surface follows — date, with verbatim only where the quoted words are themselves the operative criterion (SKILL.md, os-dev.md, references/dispatch-runbook.md x2) — and the last 原话-pointer in references/seat-post-protocol.md becomes a plain pointer. Every touched file stays at net line delta at most 0 and every rewritten line at most 120 bytes; lanes/director.md:4 (which governs the KEEP quotes) is untouched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1
This was referenced Sep 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #14859
Part of #14685
Part of #13597
Item 2 of decision batch 3 (X0 quote policy), executed on the skills lane. Ruling C on the batch card (comment 5520452691, verbatim): "C — inside
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**and.claude/agents/os-dev.md, a maintainer ruling is quoted verbatim only where the quoted text is itself the operative criterion; everywhere else the quotation becomes a date plus a pointer to the authoritative GitHub comment. The boundary is judged site by site by the executing dev and verified item by item at ACCEPT." Replacement form ruled B on the ruling card (comment 5523304679, verbatim): "Ruled: B. … at the 44 "pointer-eligible" sites in.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**and.claude/agents/os-dev.md, the verbatim quotation is replaced by（YYYY-MM-DD 裁定）with the rule stated by the surrounding text (which the classification already verified at every one of the 44); the 5 KEEP sites keep their verbatim quotes; the 4 frame-sync sites are untouched. No issue numbers (the 2026-08-12 ruling 「保留 issue id 没有意义」 stands andcheck-skill-id-lintkeeps enforcing it), no bare comment ids (a pointer nobody can dereference is not provenance)."Governed surface (
.claude/**): this PR stays draft; the seat runs the contract review in-seat and then requests human review. Labels:skip-changeset(these paths release nothing) andneeds:contract-review. Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1 (durable attribution; the footer form is create-only).What was done
SKILL.mdandos-dev.mdthe quotation span — the 「…」 text plus the lead-in that only introduced it (维护者 / 原话 / 逐字 / 拍板 …) — became（YYYY-MM-DD 裁定）with the date the text already gave. Full-width parentheses, one token per distinct date; where two quotes shared one attribution they share one token. The 5 KEEP sites are unchanged, the 4 frame-sync sites untouched, and the one undated quote (SKILL.md「明显的问题直接修…」) is kept as NODATE. Both files were byte-identical to the first flight's basef3ae441fa2at my basea6d278ba26(blob ids825912b9…/42fc96f5…on both), so every enumerated site re-located by text at its original line.contract-review.md,decision-analysis.md,dispatch-runbook.md,landing-operations.md,lanes/director.md,seat-post-protocol.md. Files classified and left untouched:compile-surfaces.md(0 sites),platform-readings.md(0 sites — its 60 bracket spans are term markers and quoted API output),rest-channel.md(1 site, SKIPPED-HOTFILE),lanes/hotcrm.md(2 charter blockquotes, KEEP),lanes/cli.md,lanes/devx.md,lanes/engine.md,lanes/services.md,lanes/skills.md,lanes/spec.md,release-aftercare.md,review-checklist.md,state-machine.md,true-green.md(0 sites each — every span hand-checked). No file in the surface is left partially classified.SKILL.md×6,decision-analysis.md:11,dispatch-runbook.md:85,lanes/director.md:67). No rule text changed, no line re-wrapped.check:pm-skill-id-lintstays at 23 files clean.Summary counts against the ruling's 44 / 5 / 4
SKILL.md「明显的问题直接修…」 — no date in the text)check:skill-frame-syncandcheck-skill-frame-freshnessgreenSKILL.md2026-08-25 原话不译, 2026-08-11 提问)references/**Per-file before / after (lines and tokens)
Before = base
a6d278ba26(upstream did not touch any of these files between base and the mergedorigin/main23619f579f); after = head5b72f66fce(refreshed after the seat-review increment). Tokens = ceil(utf8 bytes / 4), the published-skills token ratchet's convention.SKILL.md.claude/agents/os-dev.mdreferences/contract-review.mdreferences/decision-analysis.mdreferences/dispatch-runbook.mdreferences/landing-operations.mdreferences/lanes/director.mdreferences/seat-post-protocol.mdEvery touched file has net line delta ≤ 0; no ceiling moved; no untouched line was re-wrapped (line joins happen only inside a site's own sentence where the removed quote left a fragment, and every rewritten line was measured ≤ 120 bytes before commit — the ratchet's max-line-bytes rule).
Site-by-site table
Columns: file:line at head · first ~40 chars of the original quote · verdict · date written · reason (for REWRITTEN: where the surrounding text states the rule) · line delta · provenance. Rows 1–34 are the ruled deliverable (plus the two beyond-list rows 13 and 28), rows 35–70 stage 2, rows 71–76 the cross-reference repairs, rows 77–95 the untouched sites and recorded exclusions, rows 96–100 the seat-review increment (96–99 META-RULE ALIGNED with before → after text, 100 a pointer repair).
→in row 7 stands for the ASCII arrow in the original quote.SKILL.md:23SKILL.md:58SKILL.md:82SKILL.md:99SKILL.md:112SKILL.md:195SKILL.md:255SKILL.md:258SKILL.md:286SKILL.md:293SKILL.md:328SKILL.md:374SKILL.md:397SKILL.md:415SKILL.md:432SKILL.md:446SKILL.md:492SKILL.md:573SKILL.md:579SKILL.md:586SKILL.md:594SKILL.md:630SKILL.md:715SKILL.md:717SKILL.md:722SKILL.md:725SKILL.md:736SKILL.md:814SKILL.md:892SKILL.md:900SKILL.md:907SKILL.md:922SKILL.md:926os-dev.md:319references/contract-review.md:7references/contract-review.md:10references/contract-review.md:17references/contract-review.md:22references/contract-review.md:29references/contract-review.md:39references/contract-review.md:43references/contract-review.md:47references/decision-analysis.md:3references/decision-analysis.md:11references/decision-analysis.md:13references/decision-analysis.md:47references/decision-analysis.md:52references/dispatch-runbook.md:8references/dispatch-runbook.md:8references/dispatch-runbook.md:19references/dispatch-runbook.md:26references/dispatch-runbook.md:67references/dispatch-runbook.md:85references/dispatch-runbook.md:98references/dispatch-runbook.md:104references/dispatch-runbook.md:128references/dispatch-runbook.md:188references/landing-operations.md:58references/landing-operations.md:62references/lanes/director.md:19references/lanes/director.md:24references/lanes/director.md:25references/lanes/director.md:34references/lanes/director.md:45references/lanes/director.md:49references/lanes/director.md:56references/lanes/director.md:62references/lanes/director.md:67references/seat-post-protocol.md:46references/seat-post-protocol.md:48SKILL.md:126SKILL.md:187SKILL.md:404SKILL.md:762SKILL.md:893SKILL.md:896SKILL.md:52SKILL.md:319SKILL.md:886os-dev.md:322os-dev.md:324os-dev.md:417SKILL.md:873SKILL.md:875SKILL.md:880SKILL.md:829SKILL.md:641SKILL.md:727references/contract-review.md:60references/decision-analysis.md:49references/lanes/director.md:8references/lanes/director.md:10references/lanes/hotcrm.md:9references/rest-channel.md:90references/compile-surfaces.md:18SKILL.md:25裁决保留**日期 + 原话**→ after:裁决保留**日期**(原话仅在引文本身即操作性判据处保留); the preceding clause 不期待读者去翻原始 issue; moved up onto line 24 to keep the line under 120 bytesos-dev.md:22维护者裁决保留日期 + 原话。(spelled across three lines) → after:维护者裁决保留日期(原话仅在引文本身即操作性判据处保留)。across two linesreferences/dispatch-runbook.md:3本表只放细则增量 —— 原话、参数、模板、步骤 ——→ after:本表只放细则增量 —— 出处日期、参数、模板、步骤with the trailing——opening line 4 (byte cap)references/dispatch-runbook.md:123- **行文纪律**:/出处一行(日期 + 原话);实测叙事…→ after:- **行文纪律**:出处一行(日期;原话仅限操作性判据);/实测叙事…(the bullet head and its first clause joined, byte cap)references/seat-post-protocol.md:38条(原话在主文件)。→ after:条(见主文件)。— same class as rows 44, 53, 68, 71–76Gates at head
e556641d39(every exit code captured by redirect before any pipe)Derivation line (stderr of
node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --commands):dispatch-gates: gate list derived from the tree of 'objectstack-ai/objectstack' at commit e556641d39 (/home/user/objectstack-14685-item2).— change set derived from git: 8 path(s) vs merge base 23619f5 of 'origin/main' and HEAD; 10 command(s).pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions✓ check:doc-formula-expressions: 22 record-scoped formula example(s) across 426 files / 1365 TS blocks judged clean by @objectstack/formula.(first two runs answeredPREREQUISITE NOT MET, exit 3 —@objectstack/formulathen@objectstack/lintunbuilt; both built underos-verify-lock.sh, VERDICT command-exit 0, then re-run to this verdict)pnpm check:agent-model-declared✓ check-agent-model-declared: 1 agent definition(s) under .claude/agents/ all declare a modelpnpm check:agent-test-spelling✓ check-agent-test-spelling: 0 violations — 430 file(s) · 5711 bare -- token(s) · 1385 launcher-rooted run(s) · 9 separator(s) JUDGED · 5 vitest-backed script name(s) derived from 81 manifest(s)pnpm check:doc-authoring✓ doc authoring guard: 46 published skill files clean — no internal issue-id references.(+ 393 files clean, 14546 strings clean, baseline holds)pnpm check:nul-bytescheck-nul-bytes: OK (scanned 8086 text file(s) -- 8086 tracked, 0 untracked-not-ignored; skipped 7 binary; no raw ASCII control bytes).pnpm check:pm-governed-merges✓ check-governed-merges --self-test: 243 assertions (…)— report-only auditpnpm check:pm-governed-prose✓ check-governed-prose: 2 instruction surface(s) name all 5 registered governed surfaces (docs/adr/** · .claude/** · skills/** · AGENTS.md · CLAUDE.md) and claim no others.pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint✓ check-skill-id-lint: 23 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g).— file count 23, unchanged from the first flight's baselinepnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet✓ check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is 964 lines (ceiling 1005; headroom 41).·… os-dev.md is 468 lines (ceiling 469; headroom 1).·… dispatch-runbook.md is 273 lines (ceiling 280; headroom 7).·… contract-review.md is 64 lines (ceiling 65; headroom 1).·… decision-analysis.md is 53 lines (ceiling 54; headroom 1).·… landing-operations.md is 80 lines (ceiling 80; headroom 0).·… seat-post-protocol.md is 104 lines (ceiling 105; headroom 1).·… lanes/director.md is 72 lines (ceiling 77; headroom 5).(57 ✓ lines in all, self-test 20 cases)pnpm check:skill-frame-sync✓ check-skill-frame-sync: 4 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 3 files(binding sentence present in all 4; 4 count mentions agree; 40 markdown files scanned for undeclared copies)node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs✓ check-skills-token-ratchet: 36 authored bundle file(s) within their ceilings; 11 generator-owned file(s) measured, not ratcheted.node scripts/check-skill-frame-freshness.mjs✓ check-skill-frame-freshness: the decision frame in this tree is current with origin/main (fetched just now).Reverse verification (from the committed state, head
e556641d39): injected the token,#14030into the rewritten site**高置信决策卡的分诊代裁**（2026-08-12 裁定）。withperl -i; proved on disk bygrep -c(injected span 1, original span 0);node scripts/pm/check-skill-id-lint.mjs→ exit 1,✗ check-skill-id-lint: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md: 1 issue-ID citation(s) …namingSKILL.md:415; restored withgit checkout HEAD -- REPO_ROOT/pathunder an EXIT/INT/TERM trap; proof:git hash-object= HEAD blob4f4c297d75b8e089bee3f096377a372d7cadb608(match),git diff HEAD --statempty,git status --porcelainempty. Direction observed: red (as predicted).NOT MEASURED, and why: the derivation also names 1 family that is CI-measured only (it reads the workflow event payload — no local verdict exists), 9 families that apply only once a changeset exists (none exists by design — this PR is
skip-changeset), and the always-runs CI tail; all three belong to CI.pnpm lint(repo-wide eslint) was not run — declared narrowing: the diff is markdown-only under.claude/; CI owns the farm.Seat-review increment — head
5b72f66fce(one commit on top ofe556641d39)The seat confirmed the table and the gate verdicts at
e556641d39and asked for one increment: the four on-surface sentences that still described provenance as date + verbatim now state the form the surface follows (rows 96–99), and the last 原话 pointer becomes a plain pointer (row 100). Untouched on instruction:references/lanes/director.md:4(引文逐字不译 governs the KEEP quotes),AGENTS.md,scripts/pm/check-skill-id-lint.mjs(outside ruling C's surface; the seat files the follow-up). Every touched file stays at net line delta ≤ 0 (os-dev.md468 → 467, the other three unchanged in count); every rewritten line ≤ 120 bytes (max 119 B,os-dev.md:22); line joins confined to the sentence being edited. All four sentences at head read exactly as the seat quoted them (located by text before editing).Gates re-run at head
5b72f66fce(exit codes captured by redirect before any pipe). Derivation line:dispatch-gates: gate list derived from the tree of 'objectstack-ai/objectstack' at commit 5b72f66fce (/home/user/objectstack-14685-item2).— 8 path(s) vs merge base 23619f5, the same 10 command(s) as above.pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions✓ check:doc-formula-expressions: 22 record-scoped formula example(s) across 426 files / 1365 TS blocks judged clean by @objectstack/formula.(prerequisites rebuilt under the lock from turbo cache, VERDICT command-exit 0)pnpm check:agent-model-declared✓ check-agent-model-declared: 1 agent definition(s) under .claude/agents/ all declare a modelpnpm check:agent-test-spelling✓ check-agent-test-spelling: 0 violations — 430 file(s) …pnpm check:doc-authoring✓ doc authoring guard: sibling-package prose ids hold the baseline — 831 pinned site(s) …pnpm check:nul-bytescheck-nul-bytes: OK (scanned 8086 text file(s) … no raw ASCII control bytes).pnpm check:pm-governed-merges✓ check-governed-merges --self-test: 243 assertions (…)pnpm check:pm-governed-prose✓ check-governed-prose: 2 instruction surface(s) name all 5 registered governed surfaces … and claim no others.pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint✓ check-skill-id-lint: 23 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g).pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet✓ check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is 964 lines (ceiling 1005; headroom 41).·… os-dev.md is 467 lines (ceiling 469; headroom 2).·… dispatch-runbook.md is 273 lines (ceiling 280; headroom 7).·… seat-post-protocol.md is 104 lines (ceiling 105; headroom 1).· the other touched files unchangedpnpm check:skill-frame-sync✓ check-skill-frame-sync: 4 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 3 filesnode scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs✓ check-skills-token-ratchet: 36 authored bundle file(s) within their ceilings; 11 generator-owned file(s) measured, not ratcheted.node scripts/check-skill-frame-freshness.mjs✓ check-skill-frame-freshness: the decision frame in this tree is current with origin/main (fetched just now).Judgement calls (every one)
SKILL.md2026-08-25 原话不译, 2026-08-11 提问) carry attribution tokens the first census rule covers; ruling C's surface and ruling B's form apply to them, so they were rewritten and marked, not silently included.SKILL.md:641「M 及以上默认云卡」 is date-introduced but reads as a label of the superseded rule, not a verbatim ruling — left untouched and recorded (row 87). The same reading applies tocompile-surfaces.md:18(row 95).（2026-08-19/20 裁定）(row 4) writes the date exactly as the text gives it — inventing a single day would be a new fact.（2026-08-20 裁定）(收窄 —— …)), never with content inside the token's parentheses.contract-review.md:60(the quoted phrase is the sentence's subject),lanes/director.md:8(the file declares the sentence to be the seat's definition),lanes/hotcrm.md:9(charter blockquotes declared the anchor of every judgement),decision-analysis.md:49(the same ≥50% numeric criterion).rest-channel.md:90is deferred as SKIPPED-HOTFILE although it sits six lines below PR 14860's held range: a hunk there would share context lines with that PR's hunk, and its date is given only as 当日.Hot-file discipline
SKILL.md166–171 (PR 14784),os-dev.md232 / 303 (PR 14808), both decision-frame blocks and the "frame arrives in the dispatch prompt" paragraph (PR 14862),lanes/cli.md17–20,lanes/services.md21–22,rest-channel.md77–84,platform-readings.mdtail (PR 14860),CLAUDE.md(PR 14855): none touched; the diff hunks nearest a held range areos-dev.md319–321 andSKILL.md892–907 (frame block ends at 879 at head). Mergedorigin/main23619f579fbefore the final gate run; no conflict, no upstream change to any edited file.Findings (recorded here, not filed — the seat dedups and files)
SKILL.md:25"裁决保留日期 + 原话";os-dev.md:22-24"维护者裁决保留日期 + 原话";references/dispatch-runbook.md:3"本表只放细则增量 —— 原话、参数、模板、步骤" and:125"出处一行(日期 + 原话)";references/lanes/director.md:4"引文逐字不译";AGENTS.md:12-13"maintainer rulings keep their date and verbatim quote";scripts/pm/check-skill-id-lint.mjsheader "Maintainer-ruling provenance keeps DATE + VERBATIM QUOTE". Update at5b72f66fce: the on-surface five (SKILL.md, os-dev.md, dispatch-runbook.md ×2, seat-post-protocol.md) are aligned in the seat-review increment (rows 96–100);lanes/director.md:4,AGENTS.mdand the id-lint header are left on instruction — the seat files the follow-up.references/seat-post-protocol.md:38"(原话在主文件)" — ambiguous pointer (班次叙事 → main-file prose, not a quotation); repaired to(见主文件)in the seat-review increment (row 100).AGENTS.mdPrime Directive 14 quotes the three governed-surface rulings (2026-08-08 / 08-11 / 08-18) verbatim;SKILL.mdnow date-points the same three. AGENTS.md is outside ruling C's surface and wins over.claude/skills/**by its own first paragraph — no action, recorded so the two forms are known to coexist.references/lanes/spec.md:37carries an English maintainer quotation ("Does this defect give a consumer a branch it could act on…", 2026-08-26 裁决原文不译) outside 「」 — the census rule does not see it; it is the test itself (operative) and was left untouched.SKILL.md:727「推送到了」 — a measurement-evidence quotation (not attribution-introduced) survives next to a converted ruling; harmless, recorded.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1