Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 44831f4b8a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
fcc3384 to
9c5cb98
Compare
viyatb-oai
approved these changes
May 12, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
This is the base PR in the split stack for the permissions migration. It isolates stack-safety work that had been mixed into the larger permissions PR, so reviewers can evaluate the async-future changes separately from the permissions model changes in #22267.
The main risk this addresses is large or recursive multi-agent futures overflowing smaller runner stacks. A follow-up review also called out that
shutdown_live_agentmust remain quiescent: callers should not remove a live agent from tracking or release its spawn slot until the worker loop has actually terminated.What Changed
AgentControlspawn and recursive close/shutdown paths that can otherwise build very deep futures.shutdown_live_agentwaiting for thread termination before removing/releasing the live agent, preserving the previous shutdown ordering while still boxing the recursive close path.Verification Strategy
The focused local coverage was
cargo test -p codex-core multi_agents, which exercises the multi-agent spawn/resume/close handlers, cascade close/resume behavior, and the shutdown path touched by this PR.Stack created with Sapling. Best reviewed with ReviewStack.