Skip to content

app-server: test empty workspace roots roundtrip#22329

Open
bolinfest wants to merge 1 commit into
pr22328from
pr22329
Open

app-server: test empty workspace roots roundtrip#22329
bolinfest wants to merge 1 commit into
pr22328from
pr22329

Conversation

@bolinfest
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@bolinfest bolinfest commented May 12, 2026

Why

This is the second focused regression-test PR split out of the permissions migration. It protects the decision that workspaceRoots: [] is an explicit value and must not be silently replaced with cwd when replaying newer rollout events.

What Changed

  • Adds persisted_thread_permission_state_preserves_empty_workspace_roots_from_event_roundtrip in app-server/src/request_processors/thread_processor_tests.rs.
  • Verifies that a SessionConfiguredEvent with empty workspace_roots round-trips and reconstructs as an empty workspace-root list.

Verification Strategy

  • cargo test -p codex-app-server persisted_thread_permission_state

Stack created with Sapling. Best reviewed with ReviewStack.

bolinfest added a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
## Why

This is the base PR in the split stack for the permissions migration. It
isolates stack-safety work that had been mixed into the larger
permissions PR, so reviewers can evaluate the async-future changes
separately from the permissions model changes in #22267.

The main risk this addresses is large or recursive multi-agent futures
overflowing smaller runner stacks. A follow-up review also called out
that `shutdown_live_agent` must remain quiescent: callers should not
remove a live agent from tracking or release its spawn slot until the
worker loop has actually terminated.

## What Changed

- Boxes the large async futures in the multi-agent spawn, resume, and
close tool handlers.
- Boxes the `AgentControl` spawn and recursive close/shutdown paths that
can otherwise build very deep futures.
- Keeps `shutdown_live_agent` waiting for thread termination before
removing/releasing the live agent, preserving the previous shutdown
ordering while still boxing the recursive close path.

## Verification Strategy

The focused local coverage was `cargo test -p codex-core multi_agents`,
which exercises the multi-agent spawn/resume/close handlers, cascade
close/resume behavior, and the shutdown path touched by this PR.












---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/22266).
* #22330
* #22329
* #22328
* #22327
* __->__ #22266
agogo233 pushed a commit to agogo233/codex that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
## Why

This is the base PR in the split stack for the permissions migration. It
isolates stack-safety work that had been mixed into the larger
permissions PR, so reviewers can evaluate the async-future changes
separately from the permissions model changes in openai#22267.

The main risk this addresses is large or recursive multi-agent futures
overflowing smaller runner stacks. A follow-up review also called out
that `shutdown_live_agent` must remain quiescent: callers should not
remove a live agent from tracking or release its spawn slot until the
worker loop has actually terminated.

## What Changed

- Boxes the large async futures in the multi-agent spawn, resume, and
close tool handlers.
- Boxes the `AgentControl` spawn and recursive close/shutdown paths that
can otherwise build very deep futures.
- Keeps `shutdown_live_agent` waiting for thread termination before
removing/releasing the live agent, preserving the previous shutdown
ordering while still boxing the recursive close path.

## Verification Strategy

The focused local coverage was `cargo test -p codex-core multi_agents`,
which exercises the multi-agent spawn/resume/close handlers, cascade
close/resume behavior, and the shutdown path touched by this PR.












---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/22266).
* openai#22330
* openai#22329
* openai#22328
* openai#22327
* __->__ openai#22266
agogo233 pushed a commit to agogo233/codex that referenced this pull request May 15, 2026
## Why

This is the base PR in the split stack for the permissions migration. It
isolates stack-safety work that had been mixed into the larger
permissions PR, so reviewers can evaluate the async-future changes
separately from the permissions model changes in openai#22267.

The main risk this addresses is large or recursive multi-agent futures
overflowing smaller runner stacks. A follow-up review also called out
that `shutdown_live_agent` must remain quiescent: callers should not
remove a live agent from tracking or release its spawn slot until the
worker loop has actually terminated.

## What Changed

- Boxes the large async futures in the multi-agent spawn, resume, and
close tool handlers.
- Boxes the `AgentControl` spawn and recursive close/shutdown paths that
can otherwise build very deep futures.
- Keeps `shutdown_live_agent` waiting for thread termination before
removing/releasing the live agent, preserving the previous shutdown
ordering while still boxing the recursive close path.

## Verification Strategy

The focused local coverage was `cargo test -p codex-core multi_agents`,
which exercises the multi-agent spawn/resume/close handlers, cascade
close/resume behavior, and the shutdown path touched by this PR.












---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/22266).
* openai#22330
* openai#22329
* openai#22328
* openai#22327
* __->__ openai#22266
agogo233 pushed a commit to agogo233/codex that referenced this pull request May 15, 2026
## Why

This is the base PR in the split stack for the permissions migration. It
isolates stack-safety work that had been mixed into the larger
permissions PR, so reviewers can evaluate the async-future changes
separately from the permissions model changes in openai#22267.

The main risk this addresses is large or recursive multi-agent futures
overflowing smaller runner stacks. A follow-up review also called out
that `shutdown_live_agent` must remain quiescent: callers should not
remove a live agent from tracking or release its spawn slot until the
worker loop has actually terminated.

## What Changed

- Boxes the large async futures in the multi-agent spawn, resume, and
close tool handlers.
- Boxes the `AgentControl` spawn and recursive close/shutdown paths that
can otherwise build very deep futures.
- Keeps `shutdown_live_agent` waiting for thread termination before
removing/releasing the live agent, preserving the previous shutdown
ordering while still boxing the recursive close path.

## Verification Strategy

The focused local coverage was `cargo test -p codex-core multi_agents`,
which exercises the multi-agent spawn/resume/close handlers, cascade
close/resume behavior, and the shutdown path touched by this PR.












---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/22266).
* openai#22330
* openai#22329
* openai#22328
* openai#22327
* __->__ openai#22266
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant