Conversation
💡 Codex ReviewOn Windows this struct no longer exposes codex/codex-rs/windows-sandbox-rs/src/allow.rs Lines 21 to 22 in a4be788 When ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
c42e370 to
49a9062
Compare
|
Addressed both Codex review items in the current stack.
Current-head CI for #22923 is green, including Windows Bazel shards. |
## Why The Windows sandbox migration away from the legacy `SandboxPolicy` abstraction needs a small local bridge before IPC and core wiring can move to `PermissionProfile`. Leaf helpers currently branch directly on `WorkspaceWrite`, which spreads legacy assumptions through path planning and token setup code. This PR introduces a Windows-local resolved permissions view so those helpers can ask Windows-specific questions about runtime filesystem/network permissions without matching on the legacy policy enum everywhere. ## What changed - Added `ResolvedWindowsSandboxPermissions` in `windows-sandbox-rs/src/resolved_permissions.rs`, with legacy `SandboxPolicy` constructors for the current call sites. - Moved `allow.rs` writable-root and read-only-subpath planning onto the resolved permissions type. - Preserved Windows `TEMP`/`TMP` writable-root behavior when the effective policy includes writable tmpdir access. - Avoided resolving Unix `:slash_tmp` or parent-process `TMPDIR` while computing Windows writable roots. - Reused the shared allow-path result for setup write-root gathering and routed network-block selection through the resolved abstraction. ## Verification - `cargo test -p codex-windows-sandbox` - `just fix -p codex-windows-sandbox` - GitHub CI restarted on the amended commit; Windows Bazel is the required signal for the Windows-only code paths. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/22896). * #23715 * #23714 * #23167 * #22923 * #22918 * __->__ #22896
## Why This is the next PR in the Windows sandbox migration stack after #22896. The bottom PR introduces a Windows-local resolved permissions helper while existing callers still start from legacy `SandboxPolicy`. This PR moves the elevated runner IPC boundary to `PermissionProfile`, which makes the direction of the stack visible without changing the public core call sites yet. Because that changes the CLI-to-command-runner message shape, the framed IPC protocol version is bumped in the same PR so the boundary change is explicit. ## What changed - Replaced elevated IPC `policy_json_or_preset`/`sandbox_policy_cwd` fields with `permission_profile`/`permission_profile_cwd`. - Bumped the elevated command-runner IPC protocol to `IPC_PROTOCOL_VERSION = 2` and switched parent/runner frames to use the shared constant. - Converted the parent elevated paths from the parsed legacy policy into a materialized `PermissionProfile` before sending the runner request. - Added `WindowsSandboxTokenMode` resolution for managed `PermissionProfile` values and made the runner choose read-only vs writable-root capability tokens from that resolved profile. - Rejected disabled, external, unrestricted, and full-disk-write profiles before token selection. - Added IPC JSON coverage for tagged `PermissionProfile` payloads and token-mode unit coverage for the resolved permission helper. ## Verification - `cargo test -p codex-windows-sandbox` - `just fix -p codex-windows-sandbox` - `cargo check -p codex-windows-sandbox --target x86_64-pc-windows-msvc --tests` was attempted locally but blocked before crate type-checking because the macOS compiler environment lacks Windows C headers such as `windows.h` and `assert.h`; GitHub Windows CI is the required verification for the runner path. --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/22918). * #23715 * #23714 * #23167 * #22923 * __->__ #22918
412eaba to
2bd530d
Compare
Why
This is the third PR in the Windows sandbox
SandboxPolicy->PermissionProfilemigration stack.#22896 introduced
ResolvedWindowsSandboxPermissions, and #22918 moved elevated runner IPC to carryPermissionProfile. This PR starts moving the remaining setup/spawn helpers away from asking legacy enum questions like “is thisWorkspaceWrite?” and toward resolved runtime permission questions like “does this profile require write capability roots?”What changed
ResolvedWindowsSandboxPermissions, with the legacySandboxPolicywrapper left in place for existing call sites.SpawnContextand use them for network blocking, setup write roots, elevated capability SID selection, and legacy capability roots.Verification
cargo test -p codex-windows-sandboxjust fix -p codex-windows-sandboxStack created with Sapling. Best reviewed with ReviewStack.