[SDK-198] Migrate ESLint and Prettier to Oxlint and Oxfmt - #2044
[SDK-198] Migrate ESLint and Prettier to Oxlint and Oxfmt#2044HAYDEN-OAI wants to merge 21 commits into
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b014a1f580
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
jbeckwith-oai
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Comprehensive review of the exact current head. I found five reproducible correctness/parity regressions in the new lint/format path. CI and the existing suites are green, but they do not exercise these fixer and incremental-workflow cases; please add committed regression coverage with the fixes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 22a138b0ab
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 17152d6d2a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 71a534c94e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 5895555699
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: fbc8ff7713
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ee837bb39c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Changes being requested
Migrate the existing ESLint/Prettier toolchain to standalone Oxlint and Oxfmt.
oxlint@1.75.0andoxfmt@0.60.0, and remove the root ESLint, TypeScript-ESLint, and Prettier dependencies.experimentalTernariesoption.Additional context & links
Validation
pnpm lintpnpm test:unit— 61 test files and 1,453 tests passingpnpm formatand selective/emptyscripts/fast-formatbehavior verifiedTooling performance
Median wall-clock time for the exact repository checks:
Measured on Linux x64 with Node 26.5.0 and 32 available logical CPUs. Each result is the median of seven interleaved runs after two warmup runs, using isolated tracked-file snapshots of base
aeab0549and PR headb014a1f; repository ignore rules were preserved and the local untrackedcoverage/directory was excluded from both snapshots. No persistent formatter or linter caches were enabled.Combined timings were measured by running the formatter and linter sequentially; unchanged build, TypeScript, and package-validation stages were excluded.