OSDOCS-19542 [NETOBSERV] Tags#113088
Conversation
260ce48 to
32beb5b
Compare
|
Rebased 06/18/2026 AM. |
92c1ac9 to
b410f9f
Compare
|
Rebased 06/22/2026 AM. |
b410f9f to
c6a6147
Compare
| tenants: | ||
| mode: openshift-network | ||
| openshift: | ||
| adminGroups: | ||
| - cluster-admin | ||
| - custom-admin-group |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, I remember to test this Loki feature in past
5c8b23c to
bd07d58
Compare
|
/label qe-approved |
bd07d58 to
519ffed
Compare
|
Rebased 07/10/2026 PM. |
|
@gwynnemonahan: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/label merge-review-needed |
|
/label merge-review-in-progress |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-5.0 |
|
@cbippley: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.22 |
|
@cbippley: #113088 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-5.0": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@cbippley: new pull request created: #115216 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.21 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16 |
|
@cbippley: new pull request created: #115226 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@cbippley: new pull request created: #115227 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@cbippley: new pull request created: #115228 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@cbippley: #113088 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.18": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@cbippley: new pull request created: #115229 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@cbippley: #113088 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.16": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-5.0 |
|
@cbippley: new pull request created: #115279 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
OSDOCS-19542 [NETOBSERV] Tags
Version(s):
4.16+ since migration related
Issue:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OSDOCS-19542
Link to docs preview:
QE review:
Additional information:
include::modules/network-observability-logging-loki-log-access.adoc[leveloffset=+1]replacesincludes::modules/logging-loki-log-access.adoc. The Logging file onmainhas not been maintained since Logging docs moved to the stand alone format, and tags are not supported with the move to DITA. However, some content in the Logging file is applicable only to Network Observability Operator, and that content is what has become theinclude::modules/network-observability-role-based-access-control-for-loki-logs.adoc[leveloffset=+1]file.