Skip to content

OSDOCS-17172-user-provided-certs-api-server CQA#115883

Merged
ShaunaDiaz merged 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
wgabor0427:OSDOCS-17172-user-provided-certs-api-server
Jul 22, 2026
Merged

OSDOCS-17172-user-provided-certs-api-server CQA#115883
ShaunaDiaz merged 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
wgabor0427:OSDOCS-17172-user-provided-certs-api-server

Conversation

@wgabor0427

@wgabor0427 wgabor0427 commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 20, 2026
@ocpdocs-previewbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@wgabor0427
wgabor0427 force-pushed the OSDOCS-17172-user-provided-certs-api-server branch from f6d6a51 to cc4061e Compare July 20, 2026 20:39
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 20, 2026
@ocpdocs-previewbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@wgabor0427: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@wgabor0427

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jul 22, 2026

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ShaunaDiaz
ShaunaDiaz merged commit 3070be8 into openshift:main Jul 22, 2026
2 checks passed
@ShaunaDiaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-5.0

@ShaunaDiaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.22

@ShaunaDiaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

@ShaunaDiaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #116220

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-5.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #116221

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.22

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #116222

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #116223

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 22, 2026
@ShaunaDiaz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wgabor0427 looks like all of the CPs failed with a broken xref. I would:

  1. do a follow-on PR fixing that xref first on main and 4.20+.
  2. Then CP this commit over on the rebased branches that have the right link in it. (Otherwise you fix it over and over and main still isn't fixed.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.20 branch/enterprise-4.21 branch/enterprise-4.22 branch/enterprise-5.0 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants