Skip to content

OSDOCS-15970 [NETOBSERV] Module Aditi tools results: Example Block#98045

Closed
gwynnemonahan wants to merge 3 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
gwynnemonahan:OSDOCS-15970
Closed

OSDOCS-15970 [NETOBSERV] Module Aditi tools results: Example Block#98045
gwynnemonahan wants to merge 3 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
gwynnemonahan:OSDOCS-15970

Conversation

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan commented Aug 26, 2025 •
edited
Loading

OSDOCS-15970 [NETOBSERV] Module Aditi tools results: Example Block

Version(s):
4.12, 4.14+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15970

Link to docs preview:

QE review:
QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

  • To adhere to Aditi tool results, some restructuring of content was required. As a result, requested Dev/QE review to verify info is still correct.
  • Since not all content applies to every OCP branch, it is possible there will be cherry-pick failures.
  • This will likely apply to release notes since it is 1 assembly file and not all content in release notes is applicable to all OCP branches.
  • If there are cherry-pick failures, I will manually verify the content, and create manual cherry-picks accordingly.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 26, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Aug 26, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Tue Feb 24 14:37:39 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://98045--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/network_observability/metrics-alerts-dashboards.html

@Amoghrd
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Amoghrd commented Aug 28, 2025

/assign @memodi

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Aug 28, 2025

Rebased 08/28/2025 PM

memodi
memodi approved these changes Aug 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@memodi memodi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Aug 28, 2025
@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan force-pushed the OSDOCS-15970 branch 2 times, most recently from a1afaa6 to f1a21fb Compare September 2, 2025 18:48
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Sep 2, 2025

Rebased 09/02/2025 PM

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2025
Closed
1 task
jotak
jotak reviewed Sep 5, 2025
View reviewed changes
Comment thread modules/network-observability-configuring-custom-metrics.adoc Outdated
jotak
jotak reviewed Sep 5, 2025
View reviewed changes
Comment thread modules/network-observability-configuring-custom-metrics.adoc Outdated
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Sep 30, 2025

09/302025: On hold. Feature work for NetObserv 1.10 is priority.

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan changed the title OSDOCS-15970 [NETOBSERV] Module Aditi tools results: Example Block [DRAFT] OSDOCS-15970 [NETOBSERV] Module Aditi tools results: Example Block Sep 30, 2025
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Oct 3, 2025

10/03/2025: On hold. Feature work for NetObserv 1.10 is priority.

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Oct 10, 2025

10/10/2025: On hold. Feature work for NetObserv 1.10 is priority.

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Oct 17, 2025

10/17/2025: On hold. Feature work for NetObserv 1.10 is priority.

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Nov 5, 2025

Rebased 11/05/2025 AM.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 5, 2025
@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan changed the title [DRAFT] OSDOCS-15970 [NETOBSERV] Module Aditi tools results: Example Block OSDOCS-15970 [NETOBSERV] Module Aditi tools results: Example Block Nov 5, 2025
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Nov 24, 2025

/label do-not-merge

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Nov 24, 2025

@gwynnemonahan: The label(s) /label do-not-merge cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cloud-experts, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, ok-to-test, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, sme-review-done, sme-review-needed, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

Details

In response to this:

/label do-not-merge

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Nov 24, 2025

Rebased 11/24/2025 AM

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Nov 24, 2025

/label do-not-merge/hold

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Nov 24, 2025

@gwynnemonahan: The label(s) /label do-not-merge/hold cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cloud-experts, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, ok-to-test, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, sme-review-done, sme-review-needed, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

Details

In response to this:

/label do-not-merge/hold

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 24, 2025
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Nov 24, 2025

do-not-merge-work-in-progress added per Observability DPM.

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2025
Merged
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-bot commented Feb 23, 2026

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 23, 2026
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 23, 2026
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 24, 2026
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Feb 24, 2026

Rebased 02/24/2026.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Feb 24, 2026

@gwynnemonahan: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 24, 2026
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Mar 2, 2026

Being handled by #107356 . Closing unmerged, with comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

3 more reviewers

@jotak jotak jotak left review comments

@memodi memodi memodi approved these changes

@jpinsonneau jpinsonneau jpinsonneau approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@memodi memodi

Labels

qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants

@gwynnemonahan @ocpdocs-previewbot @Amoghrd @openshift-bot @jotak @memodi @jpinsonneau @openshift-merge-robot @jeana-redhat