Skip to content

origin: use workflow's TEST_SKIPS for e2e-aws-proxy#20080

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
vrutkovs:aws-e2e-proxy-skips
Jul 12, 2021
Merged

origin: use workflow's TEST_SKIPS for e2e-aws-proxy#20080
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
vrutkovs:aws-e2e-proxy-skips

Conversation

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Several router tests are permafailing, and per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882486 these are expected to be skipped.

The workflow was updated to set TEST_SKIPS, but origin test definition resets to empty skip list.

Several router tests are permafailing, and per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882486 these are expected to be skipped.

The workflow was updated to set TEST_SKIPS, but origin test definition resets to empty skip list.
@sgreene570
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 12, 2021
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Flakes

/retest

@wking
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

wking commented Jul 12, 2021

/hold

I think these are intentional; holding while I gather context.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 12, 2021
@wking
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

wking commented Jul 12, 2021

#12375 gave origin the proxy tests, explicitly setting TEST_SKIPS empty, but with the tests optional: true. The idea was that that would give in-flight origin PRs presubmit proxy coverage while folks worked on either fixing the tests to work in the proxy case or get proxy skips baked into origin instead of grafted on via TEST_SKIPS. I think that still makes sense. The reason this is an issue is because our branch-forking process dropped the optional: true bit; more context on that in #19716 (which is restoring optional: true for 4.8 origin proxy presubmits, among other things).

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 12, 2021

@vrutkovs: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/rehearse/openshift/origin/master/e2e-aws-proxy bd8d147 link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/origin/release-4.8/e2e-aws-proxy bd8d147 link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/origin/release-4.9/e2e-aws-proxy bd8d147 link /test pj-rehearse
ci/prow/pj-rehearse bd8d147 link /test pj-rehearse
ci/rehearse/openshift/origin/release-4.7/e2e-aws-proxy bd8d147 link /test pj-rehearse

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@wking
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

wking commented Jul 12, 2021

ah, @sgreene570 dropped the LGTM here and #12375 was his too. I still think we want #19716 to be more consistent about whether we consider proxy presubmits to be blocking for origin PRs, but I'll defer to Steve on how to handle TEST_SKIPS until NE-534 gets worked out.

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 12, 2021
@bparees
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bparees commented Jul 12, 2021

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 12, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, sgreene570, vrutkovs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 12, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1d4657e into openshift:master Jul 12, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 12, 2021

@vrutkovs: Updated the following 4 configmaps:

  • ci-operator-4.7-configs configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-origin-release-4.7.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/origin/openshift-origin-release-4.7.yaml
  • ci-operator-4.8-configs configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-origin-release-4.8.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/origin/openshift-origin-release-4.8.yaml
  • ci-operator-4.9-configs configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-origin-release-4.9.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/origin/openshift-origin-release-4.9.yaml
  • ci-operator-master-configs configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-origin-master.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/origin/openshift-origin-master.yaml
Details

In response to this:

Several router tests are permafailing, and per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882486 these are expected to be skipped.

The workflow was updated to set TEST_SKIPS, but origin test definition resets to empty skip list.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants