-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
1.4.2 Release Candidate #3917
1.4.2 Release Candidate #3917
Conversation
spears, throwing stars and small stones can still be equipped
using the it variable instead
more up to date format for "your last visit" message
Charm items are stackable so item:remove() ends up removing whole stack instead of just one out of the stack.
Co-Authored-By: Zbizu <Zbizu@users.noreply.github.com>
linter said it has nil value so It seems oke to declare the variable in the loop instead
Fixing The Pale Count's looktype and corpse ID. It was previously using the looktype and corpse from a Gravedigger monster.
…d into another stack (otland#3918) A crash would occur when moving, for example, a stack of a single gold coin into another stack of gold coins. The crash would only occur when the last item of a stack was being moved, aka. the stack being destroyed.
…tland#3904) Fixes these scenarios: 1. Still being able to remove or add items from a container that is placed inside of a house tile, if the container was already open prior to being uninvited from the house 2. Being able to use useable items, like runes out of a house door or from a container placed in a house door, if it was already open prior to being uninvited from the house 3. houseTile always being nullptr inside of Container::queryRemove, since the cast was not done properly, and even after fixing the cast, it had wrong behaviour afterwards
With this modification you will be able to speak within the listening event without overflow problems when starting an infinite listening loop
Otherwise packages can fail to install due to stale index
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Zbiżek <Zbizu@users.noreply.github.com>
Follow-up to otland#3926 and otland#3197. Co-authored-by: Daniel Speichert <daniel@speichert.pl>
Fixes missing cryptopp during builds...for now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just a minor request change and I think its ready
I have been using this branch to develop on for more than a couple months now, for so long that I was confident enough, it was stable enough, for me to build on top of it, my own server. So I am just saying, this is a great candidate for 1.4.2 I had zero problems with it during its use. |
Pull Request Prelude
Changes Proposed
Cherry-picking bugfixes into 1.4.1 from master to make 1.4.2