refactor: Bump jsdoc from 4.0.4 to 4.0.5

[mtrezza]

Bumps jsdoc from 4.0.4 to 4.0.5.

Closes #10374

---

Changelog Analysis

Version: 4.0.4 → 4.0.5 (patch)
Risk: Low

Changes in 4.0.5

• Performance fix: Speed up templateHelper.getAncestor() by 500x (backported from Speed up templateHelper's getAncestor() by 500x jsdoc/jsdoc#2150)

Breaking Changes

None.

Assessment

Standard patch release with a single performance improvement. No API changes, no breaking changes. Dev dependency only — no impact on production runtime.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Upgraded JSDoc dev tooling to 4.0.5 used for documentation generation.
  • Updated lockfile metadata for the JSDoc dependency (resolved package reference and integrity hash).
  • Added license metadata for the JSDoc dependency in the lockfile.

[parse-github-assistant]

🚀 Thanks for opening this pull request! We appreciate your effort in improving the project. Please let us know once your pull request is ready for review.

Tip

• Keep pull requests small. Large PRs will be rejected. Break complex features into smaller, incremental PRs.
• Use Test Driven Development. Write failing tests before implementing functionality. Ensure tests pass.
• Group code into logical blocks. Add a short comment before each block to explain its purpose.
• We offer conceptual guidance. Coding is up to you. PRs must be merge-ready for human review.
• Our review focuses on concept, not quality. PRs with code issues will be rejected. Use an AI agent.
• Human review time is precious. Avoid review ping-pong. Inspect and test your AI-generated code.

Note

Please respond to review comments from AI agents just like you would to comments from a human reviewer. Let the reviewer resolve their own comments, unless they have reviewed and accepted your commit, or agreed with your explanation for why the feedback was incorrect.

Caution

Pull requests must be written using an AI agent with human supervision. Pull requests written entirely by a human will likely be rejected, because of lower code quality, higher review effort and the higher risk of introducing bugs. Please note that AI review comments on this pull request alone do not satisfy this requirement.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a0fbb8fb-ff4b-4f4f-9e6c-044f2bdcff3f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fc909d1 and 8ad22d8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• package-lock.json
• package.json

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)

• package-lock.json
• package.json

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated the jsdoc dev dependency from 4.0.4 to 4.0.5 in package.json and package-lock.json; adjusted resolved tarball URLs and integrity hashes in the lockfile and added license: "Apache-2.0" to the node_modules/jsdoc entry.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Dependency Version Bump package.json, package-lock.json	Bumped devDependency jsdoc from 4.0.4 to 4.0.5. Updated resolved tarball URL and integrity hash entries in package-lock.json. Added license: "Apache-2.0" to the node_modules/jsdoc metadata.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The PR description lacks the required template structure (Issue, Approach, Tasks sections) specified in the repository's description_template and is largely incomplete against template requirements.	Restructure the description using the required template format with dedicated Issue, Approach, and Tasks sections. Include checkboxes and the required boilerplate.
Engage In Review Feedback	❓ Inconclusive	Review comments and engagement history are not available in the local repository context.	Access the GitHub PR page to examine review comments, author responses, and overall engagement with feedback.

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The PR title begins with 'refactor:' (a required prefix) and clearly describes the main change: bumping jsdoc from 4.0.4 to 4.0.5, which aligns with the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Security Check	✅ Passed	jsdoc dev dependency patch bump (4.0.4 to 4.0.5) with performance improvement, no breaking changes, no security issues, and proper package integrity verification.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 Checkov (3.2.510)

package.json

2026-04-01 18:17:35,578 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-01 18:17:35,582 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-01 18:17:35,583 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-01 18:17:35,631 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Failed to invoke function /usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/object_runner. with package.json
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/parallelizer/parallel_runner.py", line 88, in func_wrapper
result = original_func(item)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/object_runner.py", line 74, in
results = parallel_runner.run_function(lambda f: (f, self._parse_file(f)), files_to_load)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/ope

... [truncated 2547 characters] ...

ck__)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'package.json'
2026-04-01 18:17:35,703 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Exception traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/main.py", line 647, in run
self.scan_reports = runner_registry.run(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/runner_registry.py", line 177, in run
for result in parallel_runner_results:
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/parallelizer/parallel_runner.py", line 118, in _run_function_multiprocess_fork
raise v.internal_exception.with_traceback(v.internal_exception.traceback)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'package.json'

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.52%. Comparing base (03be0c0) to head (8ad22d8).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on alpha.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            alpha   #10379   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.52%   92.52%           
=======================================
  Files         192      192           
  Lines       16568    16568           
  Branches      231      231           
=======================================
  Hits        15329    15329           
  Misses       1217     1217           
  Partials       22       22           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[parseplatformorg]

🎉 This change has been released in version 9.7.1-alpha.3