Repository navigation
Replies: 1 comment
|
It is great to see that there is no impact on the output. Yes, let's update
the base model with these CVs. In the report, you can simply say that that
discard data was provided by wcgop.
…On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 3:30 PM kinmic ***@***.***> wrote:
@gertsevv <https://github.com/gertsevv> I ran a model with the updated
discard standard errors, and it doesnt appear to have any effect on the
model. Based on this, can we update the 2025 model to contain these?
compare1_spawnbio.png (view on web)
<https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/33fa6c4a-c31f-4446-9145-052a37235a07>
compare9_recruits.png (view on web)
<https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/14ff0a6a-ad0e-48bf-82ec-c35d81864a79>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#73>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFPYW3ESZPPUEXYOGTCEBSD25UT7PAVCNFSM6AAAAAB42CFHDKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ERDJONRXK43TNFXW4OZYGMYDEMJQGU>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
Vladlena Gertseva, Ph.D.
<https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/contact/vladlena-gertseva-phd>
*Research Fishery Biologist*
Northwest Fisheries Science Center | NOAA Fisheries
*Associate Editor*
Ecological Modelling | Elsevier
*Associate Affiliate Professor*
School of Aquatic and Fishery Science | University of Washington
<https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/>
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@gertsevv I ran a model with the updated discard standard errors, and it doesnt appear to have any effect on the model. Based on this, can we update the 2025 model to contain these?
All reactions