test(ploy): update tape config pins for Binance kinds and tick-level sampling - #560
test(ploy): update tape config pins for Binance kinds and tick-level sampling#560proerror77 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 13 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Superseded by #562 (cherry-picked into that branch to break the circular CI dependency). |
Change contract
Update
workspace_runtime_retirementconfig pins to the post-#550/#548 tape reality:include_kindswith Binance reference kinds andrecord_market_updates_quote_sample_ms = 0. Test-only.Root cause (worth noting)
The
scopejob's path-gating let #550 and #548 merge withRust integration regressionsskipped, so the stale pins reached main undetected until #559's full run. This is a scope-gating hole: changes todeployment/aliyun/polymarket-market-tape.tomlshould probably pull in the ploy integration lane (follow-up candidate, not this PR).Out of scope
Dependency / merge order
Merge before #559 and the remaining PRs — they all fail this test otherwise.
Focused validation
cargo test -p ploy --test workspace_runtime_retirement: 18 passed, 0 failedRollout / rollback impact
None — test pin update only.
Issue relationship
Refs #540