Better BibTeX exports chemical formulas/math expressions without proper LaTeX formatting in title field #3313
|
Description: Expected Behavior: Actual Behavior: Steps to Reproduce:
Example Comparison: Better BibTeX export: @article{yuDynamicStarkEffect2013,
title = {Dynamic {{Stark}} Effect and Interference Photoelectron Spectra of {{H}} 2 +},
# ... other fields
}Official APS export: @article{PhysRevA.88.043408,
title = {Dynamic Stark effect and interference photoelectron spectra of H${}_{2}{}^{+}$},
# ... other fields
} |
Answered by
retorquere
Oct 12, 2025
Replies: 2 comments 5 replies
|
Right click that entry and choose BBT - send log |
2 replies
|
Sorry for late reply. This should be the debug log. |
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The item in your library has the title (verbatim)
Dynamic Stark effect and interference photoelectron spectra of H 2 +. That is what BBT has to work with, so what you are getting is the only reasonable output. I don't know how this item got into your library, but that's where the problem lies.Next time, can you please choose to submit the debug log and post just the ID, rather than saving it and attaching it here? Saves me time, and it's also more private for you; the logs here are public, the submitted logs can only be accessed by me.