Skip to content

Conversation

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@RalfJung RalfJung commented Jan 5, 2026

With this, we should no longer need to turn off the default features, so we can undo #149550.

@bjorn3 you seem to have a test setup to check if this works properly in terms of skipping all the work that should not be required -- could you test if this PR works as intended?

FWIW we could now remove default_features from run_tool_check_step. Not sure if that's worth it.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels Jan 5, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 5, 2026

r? @clubby789

rustbot has assigned @clubby789.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Copy link
Contributor

@clubby789 clubby789 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes LGTM; I think it's more useful to keep default_features around. Going to pass this on for the testing:
r? @bjorn3

View changes since this review

@rustbot rustbot assigned bjorn3 and unassigned clubby789 Jan 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants