Skip to content

Rollup of 4 pull requests#153642

Open
matthiaskrgr wants to merge 11 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
matthiaskrgr:rollup-IHw8KqK
Open

Rollup of 4 pull requests#153642
matthiaskrgr wants to merge 11 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
matthiaskrgr:rollup-IHw8KqK

Conversation

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost

Create a similar rollup

kpreid and others added 11 commits November 23, 2025 15:00
…ing it.

This allows eliminating the `T: [const] Destruct` bounds and avoids
generating an implicit `drop_in_place::<Option<T>>()` that will never do
anything.

Ideally, the compiler would prove that that drop is not necessary
itself, but it currently doesn't, even with `const_precise_live_drops`
enabled.
In `Option::get_or_insert_with()`, forget the `None` instead of dropping it.

Per rust-lang#148486 (comment)

In `Option::get_or_insert_with()`, after replacing the `None` with `Some`, forget the `None` instead of dropping it.

This allows eliminating the `T: [const] Destruct` bounds, making the functions more flexible in (unstable) const contexts, and avoids generating an implicit `drop_in_place::<Option<T>>()` that will never do anything (and which might even persist after optimization).
…nditional-compilation, r=ehuss

tests/ui/cfg: add annotations for reference rules
…athanBrouwer

Remove `TyCtxt::node_span_lint` method

Part of rust-lang#153099.

One less obstacle before we can remove `lint_level` function. :)

r? @JonathanBrouwer
…laumeGomez

rustdoc-json: Improve docs for `ItemEnum::item_kind`

Fixes rust-lang#153279 (comment)

r? @GuillaumeGomez

CC @LukeMathWalker
@rust-bors rust-bors bot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Mar 10, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-clippy Relevant to the Clippy team. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 10, 2026
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Mar 10, 2026

📌 Commit b01e56d has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 10, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2026
Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #148562 (In `Option::get_or_insert_with()`, forget the `None` instead of dropping it.)
 - #153325 (tests/ui/cfg: add annotations for reference rules)
 - #153621 (Remove `TyCtxt::node_span_lint` method)
 - #153627 (rustdoc-json: Improve docs for `ItemEnum::item_kind`)
@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 10, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Mar 10, 2026

💔 Test for 2254b92 failed: CI. Failed job:

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
/dev/sda15      105M  6.2M   99M   6% /boot/efi
tmpfs           1.6G   12K  1.6G   1% /run/user/1001
================================================================================

Sufficient disk space available (95007120KB >= 52428800KB). Skipping cleanup.
##[group]Run src/ci/scripts/setup-environment.sh
src/ci/scripts/setup-environment.sh
shell: /usr/bin/bash --noprofile --norc -e -o pipefail {0}
---
##[endgroup]
Image input checksum 72ecab2d23f2d77608df76481a5ada15b19d498a7dc3d48372c9a7a712b5b5ebbf396a23a20676c985663ba6d58ad0821d6c2d4213f3296bb226507df1b7fa67
##[group]Building docker image for x86_64-gnu-miri
Docker version 28.0.4, build b8034c0
Error response from daemon: Get "https://ghcr.io/v2/": Get "https://ghcr.io/token?account=rust-lang&client_id=docker&offline_token=true&service=ghcr.io": net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers) (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
##[group]Run echo "disk usage:"
echo "disk usage:"
df -h
shell: /usr/bin/bash --noprofile --norc -e -o pipefail {0}

@Zalathar
Copy link
Member

Looks like we're seeing a streak of network failures.

@bors treeclosed=1000

@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Tree closed for PRs with priority less than 1000.

@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Contributor

@bors retry

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 10, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Contributor

@bors p=1000

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2026
Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #148562 (In `Option::get_or_insert_with()`, forget the `None` instead of dropping it.)
 - #153325 (tests/ui/cfg: add annotations for reference rules)
 - #153621 (Remove `TyCtxt::node_span_lint` method)
 - #153627 (rustdoc-json: Improve docs for `ItemEnum::item_kind`)
@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 10, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Mar 10, 2026

💔 Test for 5c216d1 failed: CI. Failed job:

@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Contributor

@bors retry

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 10, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Mar 10, 2026

⌛ Testing commit b01e56d with merge 0c68443...

Workflow: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/22898245678

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2026
Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #148562 (In `Option::get_or_insert_with()`, forget the `None` instead of dropping it.)
 - #153325 (tests/ui/cfg: add annotations for reference rules)
 - #153621 (Remove `TyCtxt::node_span_lint` method)
 - #153627 (rustdoc-json: Improve docs for `ItemEnum::item_kind`)
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
/dev/sda15      105M  6.2M   99M   6% /boot/efi
tmpfs           1.6G   12K  1.6G   1% /run/user/1001
================================================================================

Sufficient disk space available (95909384KB >= 52428800KB). Skipping cleanup.
##[group]Run src/ci/scripts/setup-environment.sh
src/ci/scripts/setup-environment.sh
shell: /usr/bin/bash --noprofile --norc -e -o pipefail {0}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-clippy Relevant to the Clippy team. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants