Skip to content

Remove broken dilos apt repo#156640

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
ehuss:fix-dist-various-2-dilos
May 16, 2026
Merged

Remove broken dilos apt repo#156640
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
ehuss:fix-dist-various-2-dilos

Conversation

@ehuss
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented May 16, 2026

CI is currently down because apt is unable to access the repo at dilos.org. It is failing inside the fortanix install script which tries to run apt-get with the error:

5.679 E: Failed to fetch https://apt.dilos.org/dilos/dists/dilos2/InRelease  403  Forbidden [IP: 116.202.240.188 443]

These lines in the Dockerfile were added when Solaris builds were merged into dist-various-2 in #45001. However, Solaris builds were split off in #138699. In that PR, these lines adding the dilos repository weren't removed.

AFAICT, these are no longer necessary.

CI is currently down because apt is unable to access the repo at
dilos.org. It is failing inside the fortanix install script which tries
to run apt-get with the error:

```
5.679 E: Failed to fetch https://apt.dilos.org/dilos/dists/dilos2/InRelease  403  Forbidden [IP: 116.202.240.188 443]
```

These lines in the Dockerfile were added when Solaris builds were merged
into dist-various-2 in rust-lang#45001.
However, Solaris builds were split off in
rust-lang#138699. In that PR, these lines
adding the dilos repository weren't removed.

AFAICT, these are no longer necessary.
@rustbot rustbot added A-CI Area: Our Github Actions CI A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 16, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 16, 2026

r? @marcoieni

rustbot has assigned @marcoieni.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: infra-ci
  • infra-ci expanded to Kobzol, Mark-Simulacrum, jdno, jieyouxu, marcoieni
  • Random selection from Mark-Simulacrum, jdno, jieyouxu, marcoieni

@ehuss
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ehuss commented May 16, 2026

@bors treeclosed=100

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented May 16, 2026

Tree closed for PRs with priority less than 100.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors r+

Should we kick off a try build or raise priority of this?

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented May 16, 2026

📌 Commit e795c2e has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 16, 2026
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors p=110

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 16, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented May 16, 2026

☀️ Test successful - CI
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Duration: 4h 7m 53s
Pushing be326a9 to main...

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot merged commit be326a9 into rust-lang:main May 16, 2026
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.97.0 milestone May 16, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 3514361 (parent) -> be326a9 (this PR)

Test differences

Show 2 test diffs

2 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard be326a93323e9b929525b9298f43883ac66b3b2d --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. dist-x86_64-llvm-mingw: 2h 1m -> 1h 30m (-25.6%)
  2. x86_64-mingw-1: 2h 52m -> 2h 14m (-22.2%)
  3. pr-check-1: 35m 42s -> 27m 48s (-22.1%)
  4. dist-x86_64-apple: 1h 56m -> 2h 22m (+22.0%)
  5. dist-riscv64-linux: 1h 12m -> 1h 28m (+21.4%)
  6. dist-x86_64-solaris: 1h 37m -> 1h 17m (-20.9%)
  7. x86_64-mingw-2: 2h 13m -> 2h 37m (+17.9%)
  8. dist-android: 28m 45s -> 23m 58s (-16.6%)
  9. dist-ohos-armv7: 1h 13m -> 1h 1m (-16.3%)
  10. x86_64-gnu-llvm-21: 1h 21m -> 1h 8m (-15.7%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Kobzol commented May 16, 2026

Let's try reopening the tree.

@bors treeopen

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented May 16, 2026

Tree is now open for merging.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (be326a9): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.1% [0.1%, 0.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7% [-2.7%, -2.7%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results (primary 2.3%, secondary 2.3%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.3% [2.3%, 2.3%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.3% [2.3%, 2.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.3% [2.3%, 2.3%] 1

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 513.812s -> 511.489s (-0.45%)
Artifact size: 398.43 MiB -> 400.43 MiB (0.50%)

@ehuss ehuss added beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. labels May 16, 2026
@ehuss
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ehuss commented May 16, 2026

Approving this for beta. I've asked @weihanglo to include it in #156625.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-CI Area: Our Github Actions CI A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants