Rollup of 6 pull requests#156979
Closed
jhpratt wants to merge 15 commits into
Closed
Conversation
This also syncs `RUSTFLAGS: -D warnings` which is added in rust-lang/rustfmt
…yout, r=bjorn3 Enable Cargo's new build-dir layout This PR enables the new Cargo `build-dir` layout in boostrap builds with `-Zbuild-dir-new-layout`. See: [#t-infra/bootstrap > Has anyone tested &rust-lang#96;./x&rust-lang#96; with the new build-dir layout?](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Has.20anyone.20tested.20.60.2E.2Fx.60.20with.20the.20new.20build-dir.20layout.3F/with/581660716) Tracked in: rust-lang/cargo#15010 r? @bjorn3 cc: @epage
fix issue-144595 I close the previous PR because it's too messy relevant issue:rust-lang#144595 I fix this issue by calling `look_ahead` to check if the user write a name field in the tuple struct, then try to recover after calling `parse_ty`
…eGomez rustdoc: avoid ICE when rendering body-less type consts close: rust-lang#149287
…r=JonathanBrouwer Remove unneeded `#[skip_arg]` attributes @mejrs talked with me about the `Diagnostic` rework that happened recently and suggested that the `skip_arg` might be unneeded. This PR removes all of them, except one. I'll run a perf check to see if it's actually worth keeping around or if we can just remove this attribute altogether (or eventually do the same thing in the proc-macro directly). cc @JonathanBrouwer r? ghost
…drieril add field_projections fixme haven't looked at the code in detail, but I can't see a way in which this is the correct behavior. I think ideally `try_evaluate_added_goals` just doens't return the certainty as afaik it only does so because `evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response` uses it internally r? @Nadrieril @BennoLossin
…omez,JonathanBrouwer Move check_cfg out of diagnostic attr module r? @GuillaumeGomez
rustbot
added
A-attributes
Member
Author
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
Contributor
rust-bors
Bot
added
S-waiting-on-bors
rust-bors
Bot
added
S-waiting-on-author
Contributor
|
This pull request was unapproved due to being closed. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
#[skip_arg]attributes #156942 (Remove unneeded#[skip_arg]attributes)r? @ghost
Create a similar rollup