be lazy with diagnostic items#159726
Conversation
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
be lazy with diagnostic items
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (71ee69d): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read:Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf. Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @bors rollup=never rustc-perf Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -0.4%, secondary -0.4%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary 3.1%, secondary -2.0%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeResults (secondary -0.0%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Bootstrap: 489.502s -> 487.4s (-0.43%) |
No description provided.