Skip to content

arm64ec: f128 is supported since LLVM 23 - #160779

Open
folkertdev wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
folkertdev:arm64ec-f128
Open

arm64ec: f128 is supported since LLVM 23#160779
folkertdev wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
folkertdev:arm64ec-f128

Conversation

@folkertdev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tracking issue: #116909

  • I did not use an LLM to create a change in this PR.
  • I used an LLM to create a change in this PR, and I have explained below how it was used.

Related

cc @dpaoliello (feel free to approve also, and maybe you can validate this in practice?)
r? tgross35

@folkertdev folkertdev added the F-f16_and_f128 `#![feature(f16)]`, `#![feature(f128)]` label Aug 8, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 8, 2026
@rustbot

rustbot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

tgross35 is currently at their maximum review capacity.
They may take a while to respond.

@tgross35 tgross35 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed it is

@bors r+ rollup

View changes since this review

@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📌 Commit 82b020e has been approved by tgross35

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 9, 2026
@tgross35

tgross35 commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ah actually we do build this in CI, may as well check for surprises.

@bors r-
@bors try jobs=dist-aarch64-msvc

r=me after

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Aug 9, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was unapproved.

View changes since this unapproval

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot removed the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Aug 9, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2026
arm64ec: `f128` is supported since LLVM 23


try-job: dist-aarch64-msvc
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 558a320 (558a320150db5ef21fa113b36dfb292fccfb744a)
Base parent: 4667d75 (4667d75565e47ba5df36c0df598c556b543e8624)

@tgross35

tgross35 commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors r+

@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📌 Commit 82b020e has been approved by tgross35

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. F-f16_and_f128 `#![feature(f16)]`, `#![feature(f128)]` S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants