Skip to content

Conversation

@timtreis
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 23, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.08%. Comparing base (c60c29d) to head (4f294c1).
⚠️ Report is 35 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #490      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.95%   84.08%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines        1839     1841       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         1544     1548       +4     
+ Misses        295      293       -2     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/spatialdata_plot/pl/utils.py 78.37% <100.00%> (+0.22%) ⬆️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@timtreis timtreis merged commit c5c55b3 into main Sep 23, 2025
4 checks passed
@timtreis timtreis deleted the bugfix/467-no-warning-when-the-manually-specified-table-doesnt-actually-annotate-the-labels-element branch September 23, 2025 20:24
@timtreis timtreis self-assigned this Sep 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

labels 🏷️ Anything related to Labels release-fixed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

No warning when the manually specified table doesn't actually annotate the labels element

3 participants