Skip to content

Conversation

@brbsix
Copy link
Contributor

@brbsix brbsix commented Feb 24, 2015

Are you interested in Python 3 compatibility? I tried to do it as clean and concisely as possible, but this requires future and six. I understand future is pretty big so if you're opposed to it then there should be another (albeit messier) way around it...

@seperman seperman merged commit f90f0ab into seperman:master Feb 25, 2015
@seperman
Copy link
Owner

Cool. I just added some logic to only need six and future if it is on python 3.
Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants