Make proposer_score_boost non-optional in ChainSpec#9386
Merged
mergify[bot] merged 1 commit intoJun 1, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Change ChainSpec.proposer_score_boost from Option<u64> to u64. Proposer boost is always present on real networks (40), so the optionality only encoded a never-used 'no boost' path. The on-disk Config YAML field stays optional and falls back to the base spec when omitted.
Merge Queue Status
This pull request spent 29 minutes 52 seconds in the queue, including 27 minutes 51 seconds running CI. Required conditions to merge
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Make
ChainSpec.proposer_score_boostnon-optional (Option<u64>→u64), per @michaelsproul's suggestion. Proposer boost is always present on real networks, so theOptiononly encoded a never-used "no boost" code path. The on-disk config YAML field stays optional and falls back to the base spec when omitted.Additional Info
🤖 This PR was authored by Claude Code.