chore: remove extra space in parameter descriptions

[Planeshifter]

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

Propagating fixes merged to develop between 2026-07-24 and 2026-07-25 to sibling packages.

This propagated fix corrects a JSDoc double-space typo (p - success probability) at 17 additional sites the source commit 620be0b missed, spanning the main.js twin in binomial/quantile, eight random/iter/* package lib/main.js files, four per-package docs/types/index.d.ts files, and four lines in the aggregate random/iter/docs/types/index.d.ts. Every neighboring @param line in these files uses single spacing before the dash separator, which is the convention enforced by the stdlib/jsdoc-tag-spacing lint rule. This change brings all 17 lines into conformance with that rule.

Source: 620be0b ("chore: clean-up", #13643). Target packages:

• @stdlib/random/iter/betaprime
• @stdlib/random/iter/erlang
• @stdlib/random/iter/frechet
• @stdlib/random/iter/gamma
• @stdlib/random/iter/invgamma
• @stdlib/random/iter/kumaraswamy
• @stdlib/random/iter/pareto-type1
• @stdlib/random/iter/weibull
• @stdlib/random/iter (namespace type declarations)
• @stdlib/stats/base/dists/binomial/quantile

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

No.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

Validation: candidate sites were enumerated via pattern search over all of lib/node_modules/@stdlib (@param lines with two-plus spaces before the dash, *.js and *.d.ts); each site was independently confirmed by two validation passes reading each file in full, a mechanical-applicability pass verifying exact before/after strings and single-file self-containment, and a style-consistency pass against docs/style-guides and neighboring @param lines. After this change, zero occurrences of the pattern remain repo-wide. Excluded from propagation: codebase-wide bracket-spacing style (owned by lint campaigns), new Array() lint remediations (owned by per-file lint-error issues), and auto-generated "Related Packages" sections.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

This PR was authored by Claude Code as part of an automated fix-propagation routine: it identifies fixes recently merged to develop and applies them to sibling packages with the same defect, with each target site confirmed by independent validation passes.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

---

Generated by Claude Code

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
random/iter/betaprime	$\\color{green}300/300$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}35/35$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}10/10$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}300/300$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
random/iter	$\\color{red}5590/12615$ $\\color{green}+44.31\\%$	$\\color{green}83/83$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{red}0/41$ $\\color{green}+0.00\\%$	$\\color{red}5590/12615$ $\\color{green}+44.31\\%$
random/iter/erlang	$\\color{green}301/301$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}35/35$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}10/10$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}301/301$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
random/iter/frechet	$\\color{green}307/307$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}38/38$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}10/10$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}307/307$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
random/iter/gamma	$\\color{green}300/300$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}35/35$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}10/10$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}300/300$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
random/iter/invgamma	$\\color{green}300/300$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}35/35$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}10/10$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}300/300$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
random/iter/kumaraswamy	$\\color{green}300/300$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}35/35$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}10/10$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}300/300$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
random/iter/pareto-type1	$\\color{green}300/300$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}35/35$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}10/10$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}300/300$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
random/iter/weibull	$\\color{green}300/300$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}35/35$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}10/10$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}300/300$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
stats/base/dists/binomial/quantile	$\\color{red}522/524$ $\\color{green}+99.62\\%$	$\\color{red}61/62$ $\\color{green}+98.39\\%$	$\\color{green}6/6$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{red}522/524$ $\\color{green}+99.62\\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.