docs: update parameter type

[Planeshifter]

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• propagates fixes merged to develop between c21221c1a (2026-09-04) and 7993e08c4 (2026-09-05) to sibling packages.

Propagated fix: lambda domain in Wald distribution native.js docs

30e3116 ("chore: clean-up") aligned the lambda JSDoc type in @stdlib/stats/base/dists/wald/pdf/lib/native.js with lib/main.js, changing {PositiveNumber} to {NonNegativeNumber}. lambda === 0 is a handled degenerate case; validation rejects only negative values, so pdf's main.js, factory.js, and both JS and C implementations already document and accept a non-negative domain — only native.js lagged with the stricter positive-only type. The same mismatch exists in the sibling Wald distribution functions and needs the identical one-line correction:

• stats/base/dists/wald/cdf/lib/native.js
• stats/base/dists/wald/logcdf/lib/native.js
• stats/base/dists/wald/logpdf/lib/native.js

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

No.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

Validation performed before applying the changes:

• All 39 commits merged to develop in the 24-hour window were reviewed for propagatable fix patterns; candidate patterns from 810e5f590 (int32 overflow), c21221c1a (missing option validation), 42bbbb1d6 (benchmark require path), b04bbafa8 (JSDoc parameter types), 39365ed17 (README copy), and 1d377422c (expired TLS fixtures) were searched across their respective namespaces and yielded zero remaining sites — the repository is already consistent for those patterns.
• For the surviving pattern, each target site was verified independently twice against the package's lib/main.js, lib/factory.js, JS validation logic, and C implementation (src/main.c), confirming lambda === 0 is an explicitly handled degenerate case at every site.
• Remaining wald packages (kurtosis, mean, mgf, mode, quantile, skewness, stdev, variance) were checked and are already consistent ({PositiveNumber} there is correct, as validation rejects lambda <= 0).
• Deliberately excluded: wald/quantile/lib/bisect.js (internal helper invoked only after argument screening), and TypeScript declaration files (TS has no NonNegativeNumber type).

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

This PR was authored by Claude Code as part of an automated fix-propagation routine: it identified the source commit, located sibling packages with the same documentation mismatch, and applied the equivalent one-line fixes after multi-pass automated validation.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01QpSMAc3bMjNLZnyKm6WXbt

---

Generated by Claude Code

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
stats/base/dists/wald/cdf	$\\color{green}361/361$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}35/35$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}4/4$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}361/361$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
stats/base/dists/wald/logcdf	$\\color{green}363/363$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}35/35$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}4/4$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}363/363$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$
stats/base/dists/wald/logpdf	$\\color{green}329/329$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}33/33$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}4/4$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}329/329$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.