Skip to content

feat: bump PostgREST to v14.15#2208

Merged
laurenceisla merged 1 commit into
developfrom
laurence/postgrest-14.13
Jul 17, 2026
Merged

feat: bump PostgREST to v14.15#2208
laurenceisla merged 1 commit into
developfrom
laurence/postgrest-14.13

Conversation

@laurenceisla

@laurenceisla laurenceisla commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bumps PostgREST from v14.5 to v14.15

@blacksmith-sh

This comment has been minimized.

@laurenceisla
laurenceisla force-pushed the laurence/postgrest-14.13 branch 2 times, most recently from 1e555b1 to 6a34053 Compare June 23, 2026 18:56
@laurenceisla
laurenceisla force-pushed the laurence/postgrest-14.13 branch from 6a34053 to d4cea92 Compare June 30, 2026 16:14
@blacksmith-sh

This comment has been minimized.

@laurenceisla
laurenceisla force-pushed the laurence/postgrest-14.13 branch from d4cea92 to 8ea2f17 Compare July 1, 2026 01:11
@laurenceisla laurenceisla changed the title feat: bump PostgREST to v14.13 feat: bump PostgREST to v14.15 Jul 14, 2026
@laurenceisla
laurenceisla force-pushed the laurence/postgrest-14.13 branch 4 times, most recently from 05c995c to b0fe4fe Compare July 15, 2026 01:21
@laurenceisla

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The following tests are passing:

In the PITR tests, this one for x86 is failing after reruns: https://github.com/supabase/supadev/actions/runs/29370387549/job/87242082081. I see that all the other x86 tests are skipped except for this one, so could this be an oversight? I'm not sure about the exact error here.

@laurenceisla
laurenceisla marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2026 01:28
@laurenceisla
laurenceisla requested review from a team as code owners July 15, 2026 01:28
@laurenceisla
laurenceisla force-pushed the laurence/postgrest-14.13 branch from b0fe4fe to 74c1606 Compare July 15, 2026 22:47
@laurenceisla

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@dliappis I'd like your opinion on why this test is failing and if it's safe to ignore: #2208 (comment)

@dliappis

dliappis commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dliappis I'd like your opinion on why this test is failing and if it's safe to ignore: #2208 (comment)

@laurenceisla
Right. The explanation can be found in https://supabase.slack.com/archives/C02FHG9QQAF/p1784197124810979 and the comments https://linear.app/supabase/issue/RELENG-176/postgres-smoke-tests-deterministic-arch-coverage-x86-64arm64#comment-6d0418b4 / https://linear.app/supabase/issue/RELENG-176/postgres-smoke-tests-deterministic-arch-coverage-x86-64arm64#comment-dc6bd7b1

I noticed that you are using the master branch of supabase for running the tests. Instead, could you please use the supadev branch dliappis/feat/smoke-instance-type-pin (from my most recent PR that aims to improves the postgres smoke tests) to run pitr, or any other smoke test again? This is the the workflow using clickops:

image

For more details, and a way to run all the smoke tests via the gh cli in https://supabase.slack.com/archives/C02FHG9QQAF/p1784197154614069?thread_ts=1784197124.810979&cid=C02FHG9QQAF

@laurenceisla
laurenceisla force-pushed the laurence/postgrest-14.13 branch from e24dc82 to 74c1606 Compare July 17, 2026 15:39
@laurenceisla

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks @dliappis! This is the list of the smoke tests, all green:

https://github.com/supabase/supadev/actions?query=actor%3Alaurenceisla+branch%3A%22dliappis%2Ffeat%2Fsmoke-instance-type-pin%22

I removed the test AMI suffix so it should be safe to merge now.

@laurenceisla
laurenceisla added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 17, 2026
Merged via the queue into develop with commit ad89737 Jul 17, 2026
82 checks passed
@laurenceisla
laurenceisla deleted the laurence/postgrest-14.13 branch July 17, 2026 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants