Skip to content

Move sigil into source of UnsupportedAnnotation #652

@stasm

Description

@stasm

Follow-up to #643.

IIUC, the data model stability policy now says that if we ever un-reserve, say, the % sigil, we will also need to keep it on the list of sigils inside UnsupportedAnnotation:

interface UnsupportedAnnotation {
  type: "unsupported-annotation";
  sigil: "!" | "%" | "^" | "&" | "*" | "+" | "<" | ">" | "?" | "~";
  source: string;
}

Otherwise, (i.e. if we remove % from the list), data model representations produced by older implementations will not be valid.


What was the reason for including the sigil field in UnsupportedAnnotation? Could we move the sigil into the source?

Originally posted by @stasm in #643 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Action-ItemAction item assigned by the WGdata modelIssues related to the Interchange Data Model

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions