Skip to content

docs(eve): document instrumentation providers - #1865

Draft
chadhietala wants to merge 1 commit into
instr-v2/09-provider-capturefrom
instr-v2/10-documentation
Draft

docs(eve): document instrumentation providers#1865
chadhietala wants to merge 1 commit into
instr-v2/09-provider-capturefrom
instr-v2/10-documentation

Conversation

@chadhietala

@chadhietala chadhietala commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Related to #1659 and the proposal in #1799. This is PR 10 in replacement stack #1866, stacked on #1864.

Documents the final experimental provider API: layout selection, file-derived slots, OpenTelemetry settings and destinations, reserved local and Agent Runs slots, provider- and destination-level content policy, lifecycle events, durable state, setup and eval context, handler deadlines, flush, and shutdown. It also clarifies how the provider layout changes local trace behavior relative to instrumentation.ts.

This is docs-only and correctly has no changeset.

Validation

  • node scripts/check-docs.mjs
  • node scripts/check-doc-snippets.mjs
  • node scripts/check-doc-mdx.mjs
  • node scripts/guard-invariants.mjs
  • Full stack: 6,164 unit and 618 integration tests passed
  • Full scenario run: 383 passed; two unrelated worktree build tests failed. eve-init passed alone, while Nuxt still resolves an internal package import through the fixture alias.

Checklist

  • I linked an issue with prior discussion confirming this change is wanted
  • I ran the relevant checks from CONTRIBUTING.md
  • I added tests and documentation where relevant
  • I added a changeset if this touches the published eve package
  • DCO sign-off passes for every commit (git commit --signoff)

Signed-off-by: Chad Hietala <chadhietala@gmail.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
eve-docs Ready Ready Preview Aug 9, 2026 1:39am

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant